Pilot Feasibility Study of an Anti-Stigma Intervention for Romanian Psychiatry Trainees

Background: Stigma toward people with mental illness remains a major barrier to quality care, persisting even among mental health professionals. This study evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of a structured anti-stigma intervention for psychiatry trainees. Methods: Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using a knowledge quiz, the Attitudes to Addressing Stigma and Discrimination Scale (ASTAD), and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Feasibility outcomes were also evaluated. Results: Significant improvements were observed across all measures immediately after training, with medium to large effect sizes. Knowledge scores increased post-intervention (+6.68; 95% CI 5.86-7.50) and remained significantly higher at follow-up (+6; 95% CI 4.99-7.01). Total ASTAD scores improved post-intervention (+5; 95% CI 3.26-6.74) but did not maintain at follow-up. OSCE scores increased by 0.95 points (95% CI 0.62-1.28) post-training. The intervention reached 40% of eligible trainees, with high satisfaction and perceived relevance to clinical practice. Participants reported increased awareness of stigma, improved communication skills, and greater confidence in addressing stigma in patient interactions. Experiential learning methods, including role-play and case discussions, were identified as the most impactful components. Barriers to participation included workload, scheduling constraints, and limited institutional support. Participants recommended integrating the intervention into formal training curricula. Conclusions: The intervention was feasible, acceptable, and effective in improving stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, and clinical skills among psychiatry trainees. While knowledge gains were sustained, attitudinal and behavioral changes were only partially maintained, highlighting the need for longitudinal integration and ongoing reinforcement.