Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed ABS Composites Reinforced with Multi-Scale Carbon/Kevlar Hybrid Fibers

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) provides a flexible manufacturing route for continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites, but weak interlaminar bonding and the trade-off between load-bearing capacity and deformation capability still limit their structural applications. In this study, multi-scale carbon/Kevlar fiber hybridization was introduced into acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)-based composites by combining continuous carbon fiber (CCF) or continuous Kevlar fiber (CKF) with short carbon fiber-filled ABS (ABS/SCF) or short Kevlar fiber-filled ABS (ABS/SKF). Four hybrid configurations and two continuous-fiber baseline composites were fabricated by FDM and evaluated through three-point bending tests, floating roller peel tests, peeled-surface SEM observations, and Rule-of-Mixtures-based hybrid effect analysis. The flexural results showed that short-fiber-filled matrices improved the flexural properties of both CCF- and CKF-based composites, but the degree of improvement depended on the fiber combination. Among the investigated configurations, CCF + ABS/SCF exhibited the highest flexural modulus and strength, which were 34.31% and 27.26% higher than those of CCF + ABS, respectively. For the CKF-based composites, CKF + ABS/SCF increased the flexural modulus and strength by 31.51% and 26.78%, compared with CKF + ABS, while maintaining the progressive deformation behavior associated with Kevlar reinforcement. The peel results showed that all hybrid composites had higher interlaminar peel resistance than their corresponding baselines, with increases ranging from 18.66% to 54.42%. The peeled-surface SEM observations indicated that the short-fiber-filled matrices changed the crack-propagation features, with more matrix tearing, fiber pull-out, and irregular peeling areas. The RoM-based comparison showed that the measured flexural properties of all hybrid configurations were higher than the corresponding RoM reference values. Overall, CCF + ABS/SCF was more suitable for improving stiffness and load-bearing capacity, whereas CKF + ABS/SCF showed a more balanced response in terms of flexural performance, interlaminar peel resistance, and progressive deformation behavior.