Biomechanics of Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: Material Systems, Connector Design, Retainer Design, and...

Background: Tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) remain relevant when implant therapy is limited, but their mechanical behavior depends on material selection, connector design, retainer design, prosthesis configuration, and abutment support. This systematic review assessed how these factors affect fracture behavior and stress transmission in tooth-supported FDPs. Materials and Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source were searched for English-language studies published from 1 January 2016 to 15 May 2026. Eligible studies were in vitro mechanical, fatigue, fracture-resistance, or finite element analysis (FEA) studies of tooth-supported FDP designs. Clinical studies were screened during eligibility assessment, but no clinical study met the final inclusion criteria for primary synthesis. In vitro components were appraised with the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN), and FEA components were appraised with the Risk-of-bias Framework for Dental Finite Element Analysis (ROBFEAD). Findings were synthesized narratively by evidence type and biomechanical theme. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included: 11 in vitro-only studies, 14 FEA-only studies, and four combined experimental and computational studies. No eligible clinical study met the final inclusion criteria. Zirconia-based systems were the most frequent focus. Their behavior depended on connector dimensions, connector shape, framework design, span, retainer configuration, loading direction, abutment selection, periodontal support, and bone support. Larger connector dimensions or greater connector height often improved fracture resistance or reduced modeled stress in zirconia models, but connector area alone did not explain performance across all materials and designs. Conservative FDPs were sensitive to retainer geometry, adhesive-interface behavior, connector design, and abutment support. Conclusions: Current evidence is limited to laboratory and computational studies. Tooth-supported FDP biomechanics should be interpreted as a material, design, and support system, not as a material effect alone.