Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review
Handi Y Salim1,2, Awais Tahir1,3, Wen Hui Teh1,4
1Department of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Insights
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) management requires understanding its complex causes. A mechanism-guided approach using intracoronary imaging and tailored therapies like drug-coated balloons (DCB) or repeat drug-eluting stents (DES) improves patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a significant challenge after percutaneous coronary intervention, often necessitating repeat revascularization despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology.
- The complex interplay of mechanical, biological, and procedural factors contributes to ISR, highlighting the need for a mechanism-guided management strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a contemporary, mechanism-guided approach to the practical management of coronary ISR.
- To review current definitions, classifications, risk factors, and pathophysiology of ISR.
- To critically evaluate evidence-based treatment strategies and propose a practical management framework.
Main Methods:
- This narrative review synthesizes current literature on coronary ISR.
- It summarizes classification systems (Mehran, Waksman, SCAI 2023) and risk factors.
- It discusses the role of intracoronary imaging (IVUS, OCT) and reviews treatment options including drug-coated balloons (DCB), repeat DES, and surgical revascularization.
Main Results:
- Understanding ISR mechanisms (neointimal hyperplasia, neoatherosclerosis) is crucial for treatment selection.
- Intracoronary imaging is central for ISR characterization and treatment planning, though randomized trial data for hard outcomes is limited.
- Evidence-based therapies including DCB and repeat DES offer viable options, with treatment choice depending on ISR type, lesion pattern, and patient factors.
Conclusions:
- A practical, substrate-driven management framework for coronary ISR is proposed, aligning with current international guidelines.
- Future research should focus on ISR-specific randomized trials with hard clinical endpoints and prospective validation of imaging-guided algorithms.
- Further investigation into pharmacological strategies targeting neoatherosclerosis is warranted.
Abstract:
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major contributor to repeat revascularisation despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. Its persistence reflects a complex and heterogeneous interplay among mechanical, biological, and procedural factors, and understanding the dominant mechanism in each case is fundamental to effective treatment selection. This narrative review provides a contemporary, mechanism-guided approach to the practical management of coronary ISR. We summarise the definition, incidence, and classification of ISR-including the Mehran, Waksman, and SCAI 2023 time-based frameworks-and outline patient-related, procedural, anatomical, and stent-related risk factors. The pathophysiology of neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis is discussed with reference to its clinical implications. Intracoronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) is central to ISR characterisation and treatment planning. Current international guidelines support imaging use in ISR management, though it is important to recognise that this recommendation is based largely on observational and surrogate-endpoint data rather than ISR-specific randomised trials demonstrating reductions in hard clinical outcomes, and practical barriers including cost, availability, and operator expertise must be acknowledged. Evidence-based treatment strategies-including drug-coated balloons (DCB), repeat DES implantation, lesion-modifying therapies, vascular brachytherapy, and coronary artery bypass grafting-are reviewed critically with reference to contemporary trial data and their specific clinical applicability. The choice between DCB and repeat DES is addressed with greater nuance, accounting for ISR type (BMS-ISR versus DES-ISR), lesion pattern, stent layering, and bleeding risk. Management considerations in complex subsets-chronic total occlusion ISR, left main ISR, saphenous vein graft ISR, and recurrent ISR-are also addressed. We propose a practical, substrate-driven management framework aligned with the 2024 ESC, 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI, and 2018 JCS/JSCVS guidelines. Future research priorities include ISR-specific randomised trials with hard clinical endpoints, prospective validation of imaging-guided treatment algorithms, head-to-head comparisons of DCB platforms, and investigation of pharmacological strategies targeting neoatherosclerosis progression.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management