Related Experiment Videos

Multifeature Prediction Model for Coronary Heart Disease Comorbidity in Middleaged and Older Adults with COPD Based

Rui Li1, Qiushi Wang1, Xiao Zhang2

  • 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401320, People's Republic of China.

Insights

Predicting coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is crucial. An XGBoost model identified key predictors like age and hypertension, showing moderate accuracy for CHD comorbidity in older adults.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pulmonology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists with coronary heart disease (CHD), worsening prognosis in older patients.
  • Early identification of CHD comorbidity in COPD patients is clinically imperative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting CHD comorbidity in middle-aged and older COPD patients.
  • To identify key predictors of CHD in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study of 17,862 COPD patients aged 45+ years.
  • Data imputation using random forest and feature selection via LASSO regression.
  • Nine machine learning models were built and evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations and restricted cubic splines were used for interpretation.

Main Results:

  • 40.37% of patients had coexisting CHD. Sixteen predictors were identified.
  • The XGBoost model showed moderate predictive performance (training AUC 0.871, validation AUC 0.743).
  • Top predictors included age, hypertension, total cholesterol, chronic gastritis, and uric acid. Nonlinear dose-response patterns were observed for several factors.

Conclusions:

  • The XGBoost model demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for predicting CHD in COPD patients.
  • External validation is necessary before clinical application.
  • Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the single-center, cross-sectional design.
Abstract