Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Anti-obesity medications and cognitive disorder risk: a discrepancy between RCTs and real-world evidence
Chengwen Li1, Chu Lin1,2,3, Zonglin Li1
1Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Objectives:
To investigate the association between anti-obesity medication (AOM) use and the risk of cognitive disorder in individuals with overweight and obesity.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of AOMs. Relative risks were calculated using a random-effect model.
Results:
Our analysis included 4 RCTs (n = 35,924; 17,963 AOM users, 17,961 placebo recipients) and 2 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2,303,492; 1,151,746 GLP-1RA users, 1,151,746 non-users). In RCTs, the use of AOMs was not associated with a lower risk of cognitive disorder (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.25, P = 0.88) or dementia (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.54, P = 0.97) versus placebo. Every 5-kg weight reduction mediated by AOMs was not associated with a decreased risk of cognitive disorder (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.05, P = 0.82) compared with placebo. Meta-regression further confirmed that neither absolute weight loss nor weight reduction difference between AOM and placebo groups was associated with a reduced risk of cognitive disorder. However, retrospective cohort studies showed that GLP-1RA users had lower risks of cognitive disorder (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91, P = 0.03) and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97, P = 0.04) than non-users.
Conclusion:
While short-term RCTs did not observe a substantial cognitive benefit of AOMs, real-world evidence indicated that GLP-1RAs may offer potential protection against cognitive disorders. These divergent findings highlight the need for long-term prospective trials with dedicated cognitive endpoints.
Insights
Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) showed no cognitive benefits in short-term trials. However, real-world data suggests glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may protect against cognitive disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Public Health
Background:
- Overweight and obesity are associated with an increased risk of cognitive disorders.
- Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) aim to reduce weight, potentially impacting cognitive health.
- The relationship between AOM use and cognitive outcomes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between anti-obesity medication (AOM) use and the risk of cognitive disorder in individuals with overweight and obesity.
- To evaluate the impact of AOMs on cognitive decline and dementia risk.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of AOMs.
- Meta-analysis using random-effect models to calculate relative risks and odds ratios.
Main Results:
- RCTs (n=35,924) found no significant association between AOM use and lower risk of cognitive disorder or dementia versus placebo.
- Weight loss from AOMs did not correlate with reduced cognitive disorder risk in RCTs.
- Retrospective cohort studies (n=2,303,492) indicated GLP-1RA users had lower risks of cognitive disorder and Alzheimer's disease compared to non-users.
Conclusions:
- Short-term RCTs do not support cognitive benefits from AOMs.
- Real-world evidence suggests GLP-1RAs may offer protection against cognitive disorders.
- Long-term prospective trials with specific cognitive endpoints are needed to clarify these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management

