Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimentally guided computational antibody affinity maturation with de novo docking, modelling and rational design.

PLoS computational biology·2019
Same author

Discovery and characterisation of an antibody that selectively modulates the inhibitory activity of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Rapid and accurate in silico solubility screening of a monoclonal antibody library.

Scientific reports·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Can Cavity Prediction Algorithms Help in Docking Experiments?

Diana A Kondinskaia1, Bojana Popovic1

  • 1Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, UK.

Journal of Computational Chemistry
|July 15, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates binding pocket prediction tools for protein-ligand docking. Fpocket and CAVIAR showed the best performance, but accurate site prediction doesn't guarantee accurate pose prediction.

Keywords:
binding site predictioncavity predictiondrug discoverymolecular dockingprotein–ligand complexes

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Blind docking predicts ligand-protein binding modes without prior site information.
  • Some docking tools require explicit binding site input, necessitating cavity prediction.
  • The reliability and optimal use of predicted cavities in docking remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the applicability of binding pocket prediction tools in docking experiments.
  • To identify the most effective cavity prediction tools for protein-ligand docking.
  • To determine the best methods for integrating predicted cavity information into docking algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated four computational cavity prediction tools.
  • Utilized predicted cavities as input for GOLD docking calculations.
  • Compared docking results based on different cavity representations.

Main Results:

  • Fpocket and CAVIAR emerged as the top-performing cavity prediction tools.
  • Accurate binding site prediction does not ensure accurate binding pose prediction.
  • Constraining docking input with predicted cavities improves result reliability.

Conclusions:

  • Binding pocket prediction tools can be reliably used to guide docking experiments.
  • Fpocket and CAVIAR are recommended for cavity prediction in protein-ligand docking.
  • Restrained docking inputs, even from predicted cavities, yield more dependable outcomes.