Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Balancing biodiversity and economics: Using robust Pareto-optimisation to quantify ecological-economic trade-offs in
Julia Klenke1, Volker von Groß2, Jasper M Fuchs3
1Forest Economics and Sustainable Land-Use Planning, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. julia.klenke@uni-goettingen.de.
None:
Biodiversity loss threatens forest ecosystem stability and functioning, while measures to enhance biodiversity trade-off with economic performance. Native tree-species mixtures are promoted to support associated taxa but usually underperform economically compared to non-native species, both in pure and admixed stands. Quantifying ecological-economic trade-offs remains challenging due to uncertainties in economic and biodiversity indicators. Using empirical data on economic (land rent/annuity) and biodiversity indicators (species richness) of five forest taxa from Central German forests, we applied multicriteria optimisation to forest stand-type compositions. We assess the compositional shift of pure (beech, spruce, Douglas-fir) and mixed stand types (beech-spruce, beech-Douglas-fir) under increasing biodiversity targets, accounting for uncertain indicator provision. Stand-type portfolios became more diversified with increasing biodiversity targets. Biodiversity-economic trade-offs were efficiently reduced by incorporating Douglas-fir (in pure and mixed stands) into the portfolio. However, enhancing biodiversity created economic loss, underscoring the need for financial compensation schemes.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Ecological Niches
Threats to Biodiversity
