Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Collection of Human Follicular Fluid, Follicle Somatic Cells, and Immature Oocytes from Individuals Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization
Published on: October 24, 2025
Out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by couples seeking In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) services at tertiary care
Prerana Patil1, Akshita Vikani1, Deepshikha Sharma2
1Department of Operational & Implementation Research, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Objective:
Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) incurred by infertile couples seeking In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment in selected public and private hospitals in India.
Design:
Cross-sectional observational study.
Setting:
Two private and three public tertiary care hospitals across varied geographical regions of India that provide IVF services.
Participants:
A total of 148 couples undergoing IVF were enrolled via semi-purposive consecutive sampling over a six-month period after providing informed written consent.
Primary Outcome Measures:
Using validated structured tool, direct health costs (procedures, drugs, diagnostics), non-medical costs (travel, food, lodging), and indirect costs (loss of wages) were explored. Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and predictors of OOPE were also assessed.
Results:
The mean OOPE per IVF cycle was ₹1,10,104 (±₹75,503) [~USD 1,321(±906)] in public hospitals and ₹2,30,668 (±₹1,09,556) [~USD 2,768 (±1315)] in private hospitals. The majority of expenses were on drugs and diagnostics. Approximately 30% of couples experienced CHE, with drug costs contributing 55% of total expenditure. Only 5% had insurance coverage, with an average cover of ₹1,00,625 (±35,500) [~USD 1,208 (± 426)]. Over half (58%) relied on external financial support, mostly from friends and family.Couples without insurance had significantly higher OOPE than those with coverage (p=0.029). Higher household income was also linked to increased OOPE (p=0.001). Couples undergoing treatment at private facilities had 7.7 (CI: 2.5-23.15) times higher odds of experiencing CHE compared to public facilities. Lack of insurance coverage was associated with higher odds of CHE, although not significant.
Conclusions:
Couples undergoing IVF in public and private hospitals face substantial financial burdens, often resulting in CHE. This justifies the need to improve access to comprehensive infertility services, including IVF, through public health facilities to meet the demand for this emerging health problem.
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of endometrial...
Infertility in Males
Tertiary Healthcare System
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Fertilization

