Related Experiment Videos
Imaging decision-making in suspected appendicitis in Thailand: A national cross-specialty survey with system-level
Rathachai Kaewlai1, Sasima Tongsai1, Napakadol Noppakunsomboon1
1Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand; Department of Research, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Objectives:
To characterize imaging practice patterns, diagnostic confidence, and opinion gaps regarding suspected appendicitis using a national, cross-specialty survey.
Methods:
A four-part, 79-item online questionnaire was developed and validated with excellent content validity (scale-level CVI = 0.9375; item-level CVI = 0.9794) and strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.874). The survey assessed respondent demographics, imaging strategies across clinical scenarios, radiologists' technique preferences, and non-radiologists' perspectives, and was distributed nationally in June 2024. Twenty-four clinically relevant Likert-scale opinion items were analyzed using principal component analysis. Sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.649) and factorability (Bartlett's test, p < 0.001) were confirmed. Components were retained based on eigenvalues >1.0 and interpreted using loadings >0.50. Component scores were compared across subgroups.
Results:
Among 128 respondents, most were specialists (89.8%), radiologists (74.2%), and practiced in non-training hospitals (57.8%). CT was the most frequently used imaging modality for suspected appendicitis (79.7%), followed by ultrasound (69.5%). Confidence in positive ultrasound findings was comparable between radiologists and non-radiologists, whereas radiologists reported greater confidence in CT interpretation and lower confidence in MRI than non-radiologists receiving reports. Imaging preferences differed across clinical contexts, particularly in low-suspicion cases, special populations, and following inconclusive ultrasound. Institutional factors, including hospital training status and MRI availability, were consistently associated with variations in imaging opinions and confidence.
Conclusion:
Imaging practices and diagnostic confidence for suspected appendicitis varied substantially across specialties and institutions. Targeted education, improved access to expertise, and clearer interdisciplinary guidance may help harmonize imaging strategies and promote more consistent, evidence-based care.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography