Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion
Published on: December 10, 2020
Impact of Antegrade Selective Cerebral Perfusion Flow Ranges on Clinical and Neurological Outcomes in Aortic Arch
Antonio Piperata1, Jef Van den Eynde2, Sabrina Castagnini1
1Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Objectives:
To evaluate the association between selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) flow ranges and early clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing aortic arch surgery.
Methods:
We retrospectively analysed 492 adult patients who underwent aortic arch surgery with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia between 2015 and 2024. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, or high-indexed SACP pump flow groups according to measured intraoperative flow rates (mL/kg/minute). Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, permanent neurologic dysfunction, and transient neurological deficit.
Results:
Overall, 80.3% of patients received antegrade selective cerebral perfusion flows within the intermediate range (10-15 mL/kg/minute). No statistically significant differences were observed among groups in terms of early mortality, permanent neurological dysfunction, or transient neurological deficit. When cerebral perfusion flow was analysed as a continuous variable, no linear association with adverse outcomes was identified (all P > .15). Importantly, intraoperative perfusion strategies were largely guided by clinical judgement, with flow adjustments tailored to individual patient characteristics and dynamic intraoperative factors, including extremes of body weight.
Conclusions:
No significant association was observed between SACP flow ranges and clinical outcomes within the flow ranges and management strategy applied in this cohort. Nonetheless, maintaining SACP within an optimal range remains advisable. Individualized flow adjustments by the clinical team, based on patient-specific factors, likely contributed to the observed flow distribution and outcomes.