Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Protein Families

Protein Families

Protein families are groups of homologous proteins; that is, they have similarities in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures. Protein families usually occur because of gene duplication, where an additional copy of a gene is inserted into the genome of an organism. Mutations that change the amino acids but still allow the protein to be properly synthesized, will lead to new protein family members. If these new proteins contain similar amino acids in key locations, protein...

Conserved Binding Sites

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Protein Organization

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...

Protein-protein Interfaces

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

BindRNAgen: Protein-binding RNA Sequence Generation Using Latent Diffusion Models.

Journal of molecular biology·2026

Same author

Protein-nucleic acid binding site prediction using interpretable Kolmogorov-Arnold networks with hypergraph representation learning.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

DrugDL: dual-modal deep learning framework for multi-property drug prediction and targeted therapy discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Leveraging AI-driven predictors of enzyme pH optima to unravel microbial adaptation to environmental pH.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026

Same author

Reconstructing cell-cell interaction network in single-cell spatial transcriptomics via directed heterogeneous graph autoencoder.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Atlas of predicted protein complex structures across kingdoms.

Nature communications·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.

Yuan Liu¹, Yingquan Zhou¹, Yan Huang²

¹Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China.

|July 16, 2026

Summary

A new benchmark evaluates protein similarity search methods. Representation-based methods show promise for functional similarity, while structure alignment excels at fold-level detection, highlighting context-dependent performance differences.

Keywords:

Benchmark Protein similarity search Representation-based searching Structure alignment

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Structural Biology

Background:

Protein sequence and structure similarity searches are crucial for annotation, evolutionary analysis, and functional inference.
Existing evaluation methods are limited to fold-level similarity and lack standardized protocols.
The growing volume of sequence and predicted structure data necessitates robust search and evaluation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

To establish a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating protein sequence and structure similarity search methods.
To compare the performance of diverse search approaches across various biological contexts.
To provide a standardized framework for assessing homology search tools.

Main Methods:

Development of a comprehensive benchmark framework for protein similarity search.
Evaluation of 14 representative methods including sequence alignment, structure alignment, and representation-based approaches.
Testing across multiple biologically relevant scenarios to assess performance variations.

Main Results:

Significant, context-dependent performance differences were observed among evaluated methods.
Structure alignment methods effectively detect fold-level and geometric similarity.
Representation-based methods demonstrate strengths in functional similarity detection, especially with low sequence identity and predicted structures.
Intrinsically disordered proteins presented a challenge for all tested methods.

Conclusions:

The developed benchmark provides a standardized framework for evaluating protein similarity search methods.
This resource aids in selecting appropriate methods for specific homology search tasks.
It lays the groundwork for developing next-generation search approaches to address complex homology challenges.