Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neural Regulation01:37

Neural Regulation

Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Who's Quitting? Who Needs Additional Support? Cessation Disparities by Race, Education, and Income, 2007 to 2018.

American journal of health promotion : AJHP·2022
Same author

A Review of the Effects of Valenced Odors on Face Perception and Evaluation.

i-Perception·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

Successful Single-Session Neural Self-Regulation Through Neurofeedback Varies Between Features.

Syrjänen E1, Silva J1, Astrand E1

  • 1Department of Engineering Sciences, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

Human Brain Mapping
|July 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Neurofeedback (NFB) and Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) training shows varied individual learning. Most users can self-regulate at least two brain rhythms, but success is not universal across all features, informing better NFB protocol design.

More Related Videos

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Neurofeedback (NFB) and Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research often lacks detailed within-session learning dynamics analysis.
  • A significant portion of users struggle to achieve neural self-regulation for effective feedback control.
  • Understanding individual learning trajectories is crucial for optimizing NFB/BCI protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze individual learning trajectories in neural self-regulation across four distinct cortical rhythms.
  • To investigate the frequency and spatial selectivity of self-regulation.
  • To identify patterns in learning dynamics and address the 'non-learner' problem.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty healthy subjects underwent four NFB training sessions, each focusing on a different electroencephalogram (EEG) measured cortical rhythm: frontal midline Theta, occipital Alpha, unilateral centrotemporal sensorimotor rhythms (SMR), and central Beta.
  • An intra-subject cross-over experimental design was employed for direct comparison of neural self-regulation across features.
  • A clustering approach was used to identify distinct learning trajectories.

Main Results:

  • All subjects demonstrated the ability to self-regulate at least two of the tested cortical rhythms, albeit with varying spatial and frequency specificity.
  • Unexpectedly, no subjects successfully regulated frontal midline Theta.
  • Two distinct learning dynamics were identified: linear increase/decrease and non-linear plateau-like trajectories.

Conclusions:

  • Individual learning in NFB/BCI is feature-specific, not a universal personal trait, offering insights into the 'non-learner' phenomenon.
  • The findings highlight feature-specific spatial and frequency selectivity in neural self-regulation.
  • Results provide critical considerations for designing more effective future NFB protocols to enhance neural self-regulation learning.