Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
A Single-center Experience: Clinical Profile, Management Approaches, and Limb Salvage Results in Patients with
Sharanya Vijay1, Vinayak S Shimbi1, Nabagata Mukherjee2
1Department of General Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Insights
The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification better predicts limb salvage in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients than the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS). WIfI is crucial for assessing amputation risk and guiding patient care.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Limb Salvage Outcomes
Background:
- Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease, leading to high amputation and mortality rates.
- Effective patient stratification is crucial for managing CLTI and optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify infrainguinal arterial disease using the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS).
- To evaluate limb-based outcomes based on both GLASS and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classifications in CLTI patients undergoing revascularization.
- To compare the prognostic capabilities of GLASS and WIfI in predicting limb salvage.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study of 300 consecutive CLTI patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization over 24 months.
- Patients were pre-interventionally classified using GLASS (Stage I-III) and WIfI (Stage 1-4) systems.
- Primary outcome was 6-month limb salvage; secondary outcomes included amputation rates, wound healing, and mortality.
Main Results:
- The majority of patients presented with advanced disease (Rutherford Category 6 and WIfI Stage 3-4).
- Overall 6-month limb salvage was 85.3%. WIfI classification showed significant prognostic value (Stage 1-2: 100%, Stage 3: 85.3%, Stage 4: 78.1%; P < 0.001).
- GLASS stages did not significantly correlate with limb salvage rates (P = 0.412), while WIfI demonstrated superior stratification.
Conclusions:
- The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification is a superior predictor of limb salvage in South Indian CLTI patients compared to the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS).
- GLASS is useful for anatomic treatment planning, but WIfI stage is the dominant factor for predicting amputation risk.
- WIfI facilitates evidence-based patient counseling and resource allocation for CLTI management.
Background:
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease, associated with high rates of amputation and mortality.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to classify infrainguinal arterial disease according to the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) staging and evaluate limb-based outcomes according to both GLASS and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classifications in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI at a tertiary vascular center in South India.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective observational study enrolled 300 consecutive CLTI patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization over 24 months. Patients were classified according to GLASS (Stage I-III) and WIfI (Stage 1-4) systems preintervention. The primary outcome was limb salvage at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included major amputation rate, wound healing time, mortality, and amputation-free survival. Statistical analysis compared outcomes across classification stages.
Results:
The mean patient age was 63.4 ± 12.1 years; 82.4% were male and 78.2% diabetic. Most patients presented with Rutherford Category 6 disease (68.1%) and WIfI Stage 3-4 (79.5%). GLASS distribution was Stage I (28.6%), Stage II (60.9%), and Stage III (10.5%). Endovascular therapy was performed in 80.7% of cases. Overall, 6-month limb salvage was 85.3%, with no significant difference across GLASS stages (I: 83.3%, II: 87.4%, and III: 82.4%; P = 0.412). However, WIfI classification demonstrated superior stratification: Stage 1-2 achieved 100% limb salvage, Stage 3 - 85.3%, and Stage 4 - 78.1% ( P < 0.001). The major amputation rate was 10.9%, and the mean wound healing time was 2.96 ± 0.9 months.
Conclusion:
WIfI classification provides superior prognostic stratification for limb salvage compared to GLASS classification in South Indian CLTI patients. While GLASS effectively guides anatomic treatment planning, the WIfI stage is the dominant predictor of amputation risk, facilitating evidence-based patient counseling and resource allocation.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

