Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

10:39
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire
Oguz Peker1, Mustafa Ugurlu2, Ali Gokhan Esim3
1Ankara Lokman Hekim Akay Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Ankara, Turkiye.
Summary
The Turkish version of the Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire (RDSQ-29) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing reward deficiency syndrome and related traits in clinical and research settings.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychometrics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) is characterized by traits like risk-seeking behavior and social concerns.
- Assessing RDS is crucial for understanding and treating related behavioral issues.
- The Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire (RDSQ-29) measures these characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the RDSQ-29.
- To confirm the psychometric properties of the RDSQ-29 for Turkish-speaking populations.
- To establish the scale's utility in clinical and research applications.
Main Methods:
- 481 participants completed the Turkish RDSQ-29 and related psychological scales.
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a bifactor model was employed.
- Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability were assessed.
- Pearson correlations were used for criterion validity analysis.
Main Results:
- The bifactor model showed acceptable fit, indicating a robust factor structure.
- The Turkish RDSQ-29 demonstrated strong internal consistency (α=0.920) and high test-retest reliability (r=0.884).
- Significant correlations with impulsivity and anxiety supported criterion validity.
- Gender differences in RDSQ-29 scores were observed.
Conclusions:
- The Turkish RDSQ-29 is a psychometrically sound instrument.
- The scale is suitable for assessing reward deficiency syndrome and related traits in Turkish contexts.
- Findings support the use of the Turkish RDSQ-29 in clinical practice and research.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.