Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NGSE-Corr: A technique for objective clinical evaluation of quantitative-imaging methods without a gold standard.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same author

Progress in SPECT and PET Reconstruction for Theranostics: From Diagnosis to Therapy.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

Nuclear Medicine AI in Action: The Bethesda Report (AI Summit 2024).

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2025
Same author

Advances in SPECT and PET Reconstruction for Theranostics: From Diagnosis to Therapy.

PET clinics·2025
Same author

What Is Implementation Science: And Why It Matters for Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Innovation-to-Application Gap in Medical Imaging.

PET clinics·2025
Same author

Development and in silico imaging trial evaluation of a deep-learning-based transmission-less attenuation compensation method for DaT SPECT.

ArXiv·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Extending Regression Without Truth to Integrate Ground-Truth Measurements for Evaluating Quantitative Imaging Methods

Yan Liu1, Abhinav K Jha1,2

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Proceedings of Spie--The International Society for Optical Engineering
|July 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating quantitative imaging (QI) methods is challenging without gold standards. This study introduces a novel approach combining patient data and ground-truth datasets to improve QI method evaluation, especially with limited patient samples.

Keywords:
maximum likelihood estimationno-gold-standard evaluationquantitative imaging

More Related Videos

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biostatistics
  • Quantitative Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods is crucial but often limited by the absence of gold standards in patient data.
  • Existing regression-without-truth (RWT) techniques require extensive patient samples, which are not always feasible, particularly for rare diseases or novel imaging procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel approach for the objective evaluation of QI methods using limited patient samples.
  • To integrate information from patient data lacking ground truth with datasets possessing known ground truth.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed an approach that combines patient data without ground truth and datasets with known ground truth.
  • Validated the approach using numerical studies to assess its performance in ranking QI methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed approach demonstrated improved performance in ranking QI methods compared to traditional RWT techniques.
  • Numerical studies confirmed the effectiveness of integrating both data types for QI method evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The developed approach shows significant potential for evaluating QI methods when patient data is limited.
  • Further validation using clinically realistic simulations and clinical data is warranted to confirm its broader applicability.