Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural Timeline of Contextual Guidance in Naturalistic Visual Search Across Task Difficulty Levels.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Rhythmic activity in resting-state EEG predicts trait anxiety.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Inverted list-strength effects in recognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

A Feature-Space Theory of the Production Effect in Recognition.

Experimental psychology·2024
Same author

A cross-species framework for investigating perceptual evidence accumulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Lack of effects of acute exercise intensity on mnemonic discrimination.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

EEG Activity Predictive of Learning Through Feedback.

Matthew Danyluik1, Sucheta Chakravarty2, Jeremy B Caplan3,4

  • 1Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada.

Computational Brain & Behavior
|July 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Multivariate classifiers reveal more brain activity tracking incremental learning from feedback than previously known. This approach uncovers neural encoding beyond established markers like feedback-related negativity (FRN) and frontal midline theta (FMT).

Keywords:
Classifier analysesFeedback-driven learningFeedback-related negativityFrontal midline thetaSubsequent memory effectVerbal memory

More Related Videos

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography (dEEG)
12:48

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography (dEEG)

Published on: June 27, 2011

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography (dEEG)
12:48

Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography (dEEG)

Published on: June 27, 2011

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning in Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Current understanding of neural mechanisms in feedback-driven learning relies heavily on descriptive, univariate analyses.
  • Established electroencephalography (EEG) markers like feedback-related negativity (FRN) and frontal midline theta (FMT) show limited predictive power for trial-to-trial learning.
  • There is a need to explore more comprehensive neural signals for tracking learning at an item level.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if neural activity beyond established EEG markers can predict item-level learning from trial-and-error feedback.
  • To apply a classifier-based approach to identify basic neural encoding processes in incremental learning.
  • To compare the predictive power of multivariate classifiers with traditional univariate analyses (FRN, FMT).

Main Methods:

  • Participants (N=45) learned 48 word-value mappings through trial-and-error.
  • EEG data were analyzed using established markers (FRN, FMT) and multivariate classifiers (LDA, SVM).
  • Classification performance was evaluated using time-domain and time-frequency spectral features, with AUC as a metric.

Main Results:

  • Established EEG markers (FRN, FMT) showed predictive value for trial-to-trial learning, validating their behavioral relevance but with limited effect size.
  • Multivariate classifiers, incorporating broader signal features, significantly outperformed univariate analyses in predicting learning (AUC ~0.7).
  • Time-frequency spectral features yielded better classification accuracy than time-domain features.
  • Classification success was not attributable to systematic variations in accuracy with trial number.

Conclusions:

  • Established EEG markers (FRN, FMT) represent only a fraction of the neural information related to feedback-driven learning.
  • Multivariate classifiers effectively uncover richer, subject-specific, spatiotemporal neural features that track incremental learning at the item level.
  • This study extends classifier-based approaches from episodic memory to incremental, feedback-driven learning, revealing deeper insights into neural encoding.