Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
Simplified BALAD (BALAD-S) Score as a Guide for First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Selection for Unresectable
Atsushi Hiraoka1, Toshifumi Tada2,3, Masashi Hirooka4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
The simplified BALAD-based score (BALAD-S) helps predict outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre). BALAD-S stratification identifies patients who benefit more from specific first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens.
Area of Science:
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research
- Immunotherapy Biomarkers
- Clinical Outcome Prediction
Background:
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimens like atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) are standard for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
- Limited biomarkers exist to guide the selection between these effective ICI-based treatments.
- The simplified BALAD-based score (BALAD-S) was investigated as a potential predictive biomarker.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between the simplified BALAD-based score (BALAD-S) and differential treatment outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
- To determine if BALAD-S can help stratify patients for first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study of 752 Japanese patients with uHCC receiving first-line Atez/Bev or Dur/Tre.
- BALAD-S was calculated using bilirubin, albumin, AFP, AFP-L3, and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin.
- Patients were stratified into BALAD-S low (≤ 2) and high (≥ 3) groups to compare treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Main Results:
- In the BALAD-S low group, Atez/Bev demonstrated significantly longer PFS and OS compared to Dur/Tre.
- In the BALAD-S high group, OS was significantly longer with Dur/Tre than Atez/Bev, while PFS did not differ significantly.
- A significant interaction was observed between BALAD-S category and treatment choice, indicating differential treatment effects based on the score.
Conclusions:
- Treatment outcomes for Atez/Bev and Dur/Tre regimens in uHCC vary significantly based on the BALAD-S score.
- The BALAD-S score shows promise as a stratification marker to guide the selection of first-line ICI-based therapies in uHCC.
- Further validation is needed for BALAD-S to confirm its utility in clinical decision-making for uHCC treatment.
More Related Videos
08:25Mass Cytometry Analysis of Systemic and Local Immune Responses in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: April 25, 2025
07:32Mast Cells in the Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Confer Favorable Prognosis: A Retrospective Study using QuPath Image Analysis Software
Published on: April 12, 2024