Related Experiment Videos
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Clevidipine Versus Nicardipine in Hypertensive Emergencies: A Systematic Review
Tahir Ullah1, Hamed Khan1, Anfal Khan1
1Saidu Medical College, Swat, Pakistan.
Insights
Clevidipine and nicardipine are equally effective and safe for hypertensive emergencies. While clevidipine showed faster blood pressure control in some groups and lower infusion volumes, overall clinical superiority was not proven.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Hypertensive emergencies necessitate rapid blood pressure reduction to avert target-organ damage.
- Intravenous clevidipine and nicardipine are common dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, but their comparative effectiveness is unclear.
- This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed clinical outcomes of clevidipine versus nicardipine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of clevidipine and nicardipine in managing hypertensive emergencies.
- To evaluate key clinical outcomes including time to target systolic blood pressure (SBP) and length of stay.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
- Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 3, 2026.
- Included 9 studies with 1378 adult patients requiring acute SBP control.
Main Results:
- No significant differences found between clevidipine and nicardipine for primary and secondary outcomes.
- Clevidipine demonstrated faster SBP target attainment in stroke/neurocritical care and general hypertensive crisis subgroups.
- Clevidipine was associated with significantly lower infusion drug volume.
Conclusions:
- Clevidipine and nicardipine exhibit comparable efficacy and safety profiles in hypertensive emergencies.
- Clevidipine offers potential advantages in infusion volume and speed of SBP control in specific populations.
- Larger randomized trials are recommended to validate these findings.
Background:
Hypertensive emergencies require prompt blood pressure reduction to prevent acute target-organ damage. Clevidipine and nicardipine are commonly used intravenous dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes associated with clevidipine versus nicardipine.
Methods:
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through July 3, 2026. Comparative studies evaluating intravenous clevidipine and nicardipine in adults requiring acute systolic blood pressure (SBP) control were included. Primary outcomes were time to target SBP and percentage of time within the target SBP range. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, infusion drug volume, hypotension, tachycardia, acute kidney injury, rescue antihypertensive therapy, and in-hospital mortality.
Results:
Nine studies involving 1378 patients (eight retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial) were included. No significant differences were observed between clevidipine and nicardipine in time to target SBP, percentage of time within the target SBP range, ICU or hospital length of stay, hypotension, tachycardia, acute kidney injury, rescue antihypertensive therapy, or in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significantly faster target SBP attainment with clevidipine in stroke/neurocritical care and general hypertensive crisis populations. Clevidipine was associated with significantly lower infusion drug volume.
Conclusions:
Clevidipine and nicardipine demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for hypertensive emergencies. Although clevidipine achieved lower infusion volumes and faster target SBP attainment in subgroup analyses, no consistent overall clinical superiority was observed. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Drugs in...
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management