Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

03:30
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: October 25, 2024
Should Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure Be Measured on Prolapse Reduction?
Hans Peter Dietz1, Ka Lai Shek2, Joseph Descallar3,4
1Sydney Urodynamic Centres, Sydney, Australia. hpdietz2@bigpond.com.
International Urogynecology Journal
|July 16, 2026
Summary
Reducing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) did not significantly improve the prediction of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) grading. Therefore, prolapse reduction may not be necessary in clinical practice for assessing maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP).
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Female Pelvic Medicine
- Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Background:
- Maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) assesses urethral function and correlates with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).
- Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can confound the relationship between MUCP and USI.
- The impact of POP reduction on MUCP and its predictive value for USI requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of pelvic organ prolapse reduction on maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP).
- To assess whether MUCP measured during prolapse reduction improves prediction of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) grading compared to MUCP at rest.
Main Methods:
- Observational study of 1992 women undergoing urodynamic testing.
- MUCP measured at rest and during POP reduction.
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) and translabial ultrasound used.
- Nominal regression analyzed associations between MUCP and USI grading.
Main Results:
- Mean MUCP decreased significantly from 39.1 cm H2O at rest to 33.9 cm H2O on prolapse reduction (p < 0.001).
- This reduction was greater in women reporting splinting and weakly associated with prolapse severity.
- Both MUCP at rest and during prolapse reduction predicted USI and its grading (p < 0.001).
- MUCP during prolapse reduction offered no significant improvement in predicting USI grading (Nagelkerke R² = 0.14 vs 0.13).
Conclusions:
- Symptoms of splinting and objective prolapse predict lower MUCP on prolapse reduction.
- However, prolapse reduction does not significantly enhance the prediction of USI grading.
- Measuring MUCP during prolapse reduction is likely unnecessary in routine clinical practice.

