Related Experiment Videos
Synergistic effect of AIP and cystatin C: a study on cardiovascular risk prediction in populations with different
Kuangyi Wang1, Yufeng Jiang1, Liangping Zhao1
1Department of Cardiology, Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical Center of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, Republic of China.
Insights
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma-Cystatin C (AIP-Cys) composite biomarker predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in individuals with normal glucose regulation and pre-diabetes. Its predictive value is limited in diabetes mellitus and for long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Biomarker discovery and validation
- Cardiovascular disease epidemiology
- Metabolic syndrome and diabetes research
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant global health issue.
- Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) and Cystatin C are emerging biomarkers for lipid metabolism and renal/inflammatory status.
- The combined AIP-Cys indicator may offer enhanced CVD risk prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive role of the AIP-Cys composite indicator for incident CVD.
- To investigate this role across different glycemic statuses: normal glucose regulation (NGR), pre-diabetes (preDM), and diabetes mellitus (DM).
- To explore the relationship's linearity and potential mediating factors.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) dataset (n=6,035).
- Baseline AIP-Cys measured in participants aged ≥45 years without prior CVD.
- Incident CVD events (heart disease or stroke) tracked until 2020; Cox proportional hazards models used for analysis.
Main Results:
- AIP-Cys independently predicted incident CVD in overall, NGR, and preDM populations (HRs 1.34-1.60), but not in the DM population.
- Nonlinear relationships with threshold effects observed in NGR and preDM groups, with highest risk in the third quartile of AIP-Cys.
- Systolic blood pressure partially mediated the association (14.6%); short-term predictive performance was modest, long-term prediction was limited.
Conclusions:
- AIP-Cys serves as an independent CVD risk factor in NGR and preDM individuals, particularly below specific nonlinear thresholds.
- The indicator's predictive utility is diminished in the DM population and for long-term risk assessment.
- AIP-Cys offers a novel biomarker approach for early CVD risk identification in pre-diabetes, warranting further clinical research.
Background:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) poses a major global health burden. The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) and Cystatin C are novel biomarkers reflecting lipid metabolism disorders and renal/micro-inflammatory status, respectively. Their combined indicator (AIP-Cys, the product of AIP × Cystatin C) may provide improved predictive value beyond either marker alone. This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of AIP-Cys for the risk of incident CVD across different glycemic statuses: normal glucose regulation (NGR), pre-diabetes (preDM), and diabetes mellitus (DM).
Materials And Methods:
This study was based on the prospective China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) cohort. A total of 6,035 participants aged ≥ 45 years without a history of CVD at baseline (2011) were included. The primary exposure was baseline AIP-Cys (the product of AIP × Cystatin C), and the outcome was the first self-reported incident heart disease or stroke event during follow-up (until 2020). Glycemic status was defined based on fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Restricted cubic splines and piecewise linear models were applied to analyze nonlinear relationships. Mediation and sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the results.
Results:
During a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 651 incident CVD cases occurred. In the fully adjusted model, AIP-Cys was independently associated with CVD risk in the overall (HR per unit increase: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06-1.69), NGR (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.13-2.26), and preDM (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.02-1.70) populations, but not in the DM population. RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear relationship in the NGR and preDM groups (P for nonlinearity < 0.05). Piecewise regression identified inflection points (0.47 for NGR; 0.37 for preDM), below which risk increased sharply. Quartile analysis showed the highest risk in Q3 rather than Q4, suggesting a saturation effect. Mediation analysis indicated that systolic blood pressure partially mediated this association (mediating proportion: 14.6% in overall population). The predictive performance of AIP-Cys was modest for short-term risk (1-year AUC: 0.64-0.67) but limited for long-term prediction.
Conclusions:
The composite indicator AIP-Cys, derived from AIP and Cystatin C, is an independent risk factor for incident CVD in individuals with NGR and preDM. The association exhibits a nonlinear threshold pattern. However, its predictive value is limited in the DM population, and its long-term predictive performance is modest. Additionally, the self-reported nature of cardiovascular outcomes represents a limitation that should be considered when interpreting these findings. By integrating lipid metabolism and renal/inflammatory pathways, this indicator offers a novel biomarker-based approach for early cardiovascular risk identification in the pre-diabetes stage. Future research should further explore its potential for clinical translation and intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction