Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

09:02
Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
Genomic Architecture of IRF4 Rearrangements in Children and Adult Large B-cell Lymphomas
Ariadna Colmenero1, Leonie Frauenfeld2, Sara Mato1
1Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Blood Advances
|July 17, 2026
Summary
Large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement (LBCL-IRF4) differs between children and adults. Adult LBCL-IRF4 shows distinct genetic complexity and mutations, suggesting it
Area of Science:
- Hematology and Oncology
- Genetics and Genomics
- Molecular Pathology
Background:
- Large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement (LBCL-IRF4) predominantly affects children and young adults (CAYA), presenting with localized disease and excellent prognosis.
- The role of cryptic rearrangements and the biological entity of IRF4-rearranged LBCL (IRF4-R LBCL) in adults remain unclear.
- Understanding age-related differences in IRF4-R LBCL is crucial for accurate classification and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the molecular and genetic differences between LBCL-IRF4 in CAYA and adult patients.
- To determine if adult IRF4-R LBCL represents the same biological entity as the pediatric/young adult form.
- To identify distinct genetic features and mutational profiles associated with age in IRF4-R LBCL.
Main Methods:
- Integrative molecular analysis of 35 CAYA and 7 adult LBCL-IRF4 cases.
- Targeted sequencing for structural variant analysis (SV-NGS) to confirm IRF4 rearrangements.
- Whole-exome sequencing to identify mutations and analyze genetic complexity.
Main Results:
- IRF4 rearrangements were confirmed in 84% of cases by SV-NGS.
- CAYA cases showed enrichment of IGH translocations (55%), including cryptic insertions.
- Adult IRF4-R LBCL exhibited higher genetic complexity, distinct mutations (KMT2D, DTX1, MYD88-L265P), and predicted subtypes (EZB, MCD), correlating with extranodal involvement and advanced stage.
Conclusions:
- IRF4-R LBCL in adults possesses distinct genetic architecture and mutational profiles compared to CAYA.
- Age-dependent differences in genetic features suggest that adult IRF4-R LBCL may not be the same biological entity as in CAYA.
- These findings support the need for age-stratified classification of IRF4-R LBCL.

