Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Potential Risks and Benefits of Low-Barrier Access and Monitoring for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: A Modeling Study
Adrien V Le Guillou1,2, Julia L Marcus3, Douglas S Krakower3,4
1Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Background:
PrEP prevents HIV acquisition, but its population-level impact is limited by access barriers. Low-barrier delivery of daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), such as over-the-counter (OTC) availability, could improve access by eliminating clinic visits, though reduced monitoring may increase risks including drug resistance, renal toxicity, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We estimated the benefits and risks of OTC PrEP.
Methods:
Using a stochastic network-based model of HIV/STI transmission among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Atlanta, we simulated two delivery pathways: clinic-based PrEP and OTC PrEP with simplified initiation and reduced monitoring. We modeled 10-50% increases in PrEP coverage over 10 years. Outcomes included HIV infections averted, STI incidence, contraindicated PrEP use (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), HBV reactivations, and drug resistance.
Results:
By expanding coverage, OTC PrEP reduced HIV incidence across all scenarios. A 50% coverage increase averted 15.4% of HIV infections. However, clinical risks increased: renal impairment exposure rose from 2.5% to 4.8%; HBV reactivations reached 2.27 per 100 person-years; and TDF/FTC resistance rose from 0.68 to 8.40 events per 100 incident HIV infections. In sensitivity analyses, confirming HIV-negative status at initiation reduced resistance by >90% without reducing prevention benefits, and frequent renal monitoring reduced renal risk.
Conclusions:
OTC PrEP could produce population-level HIV prevention benefits if it expands coverage beyond clinic-based care. However, its net public health impact depends on implementation choices that preserve safety functions, particularly HIV testing at initiation and renal monitoring, without undermining access gains.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Amebiasis
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
