Related Experiment Videos
Evaluating the Outcomes of the Capacity-Building Support From a Collaborative Network of Implementation Science
Sung-Jae Lee1, Hannah Mestel2, Carolyn M Audet3
1Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Population Behavioral Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
JMIR Research Protocols
|July 17, 2026
Summary
This study evaluates the CHESHIRE network
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Implementation Science
- HIV Research
Background:
- Implementation science (IS) is crucial for translating research into health outcomes.
- Few studies evaluate models for building IS capacity through technical assistance.
- The CHESHIRE network supports US-based HIV researchers in the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative.
Purpose of the Study:
- Describe the CHESHIRE evaluation protocol.
- Assess the impact of hub technical assistance on EHE-funded research teams.
- Evaluate outcomes including IS competencies, collaboration, and productivity.
Main Methods:
- Mixed methods evaluation: qualitative interviews (n=36), social network analysis (n=265).
- Secondary data analysis of NIH RePORTER, PubMed, and EHE Project Survey data (n=248).
- Descriptive analyses, network metrics, and thematic coding to assess outcomes.
Main Results:
- CHESHIRE activities funded 2019-2024; data collection ongoing, publication anticipated December 2026.
- 265 network members enrolled; survey data from August 2021-February 2025.
- Findings will indicate if CHESHIRE enhances IS competencies, partnerships, and productivity.
Conclusions:
- Evaluation provides empirical evidence for optimizing technical assistance hubs in public health.
- Findings will inform strategies for IS capacity building and intervention translation.
- Results will accelerate evidence-based intervention implementation, particularly for HIV prevention and treatment.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...