Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Minor stroke, major stakes: impact of procedure duration on thrombectomy outcomes in minor stroke
Rahim Abo Kasem1, Bachar El Baba2, Tianwen Ma3
11Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Objective:
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute large-vessel occlusion stroke is well established, yet its role in patients presenting with minor stroke symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score < 6) remains unclear. Prior studies have not accounted for intraprocedural factors that may influence outcomes in this subgroup.
Methods:
The authors analyzed 5693 patients from the STAR (Stroke and Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry), including 398 with low NIHSS scores, to evaluate the association between procedure time (PT) and outcomes. Among patients with low NIHSS scores, propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between those with PT ≤ 35 versus > 35 minutes, a cutoff defined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The authors performed a meta-analysis of studies reporting best medical management (BMM) outcomes in patients with low NIHSS scores. To compare these with EVT-treated patients, a matched BMM comparator cohort using stratification on pooled baseline characteristics was constructed. Outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-2), intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality.
Results:
PT had a stronger negative effect on outcomes in patients with low NIHSS scores compared with those with high scores, with a steeper decline in functional independence per minute of PT (slope: -0.45% vs -0.21%; p = 0.03 for interaction). Among patients with low scores, PT ≤ 35 minutes was associated with higher 90-day functional independence compared with the propensity score-matching cohort with PT > 35 minutes (82.6% vs 59.0%, p < 0.001). When benchmarked against BMM (75.2% mRS scores 0-2), patients undergoing EVT within 35 minutes had superior outcomes (85.1%, p = 0.047). In contrast, EVT with PT > 35 minutes resulted in worse outcomes than BMM (mRS scores 0-2: 59.8%, p = 0.008). The number needed to treat for PT ≤ 35 minutes was 10, whereas PT > 35 minutes yielded a number needed to harm of 6.
Conclusions:
PT critically modulates the benefit of EVT in minor stroke. While efficient EVT yields better outcomes than BMM, prolonged procedures are associated with harm. These findings may explain prior inconsistent evidence on EVT in patients with low NIHSS scores and underscore the need to individualize procedural thresholds in this population.
