Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Postural Organization of Gait Initiation for Biomechanical Analysis Using Force Platform Recordings
Published on: July 26, 2022
Force-plate-free estimation of ground reaction forces and lower-limb joint moments during gait using a single RGB-D
Keisuke Kubota1, Haruo Aoki2, Ayato Nakamura2
1Research and Development Center, Saitama Prefectural University, Saitama 343-8540, Japan.
Background:
Three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis provides clinically relevant kinematics and kinetics but is limited by the high cost and extensive infrastructure of marker-based motion capture and force plates.
Research Question:
This study validates a hybrid markerless approach for gait analysis. The approach estimates 3D poses from a single RGB-D camera, recovers 3D ground reaction forces (GRFs) using physics-based optimization, and computes the lower limb joint moments using inverse dynamics without force plates.
Methods:
The study involved 10 healthy adults who walked at a self-selected speed. A marker-based motion capture system and embedded force plates were employed to collect data simultaneously. Two successful trials were conducted with each participant. Signals were synchronized, resampled to 120 Hz, and time-normalized to 0-100% stance (101 points). Waveform agreements for right-limb GRFs and sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles and moments were quantified using the root mean square error (RMSE), normalized RMSE (NRMSE), bias, Pearson's correlation (r), and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).
Results:
Sagittal joint angles showed high correlations (hip: r = 0.94 ± 0.05, RMSE = 11.84 ± 4.53°; knee: r = 0.91 ± 0.08, RMSE = 5.42 ± 1.93°; ankle: r = 0.89 ± 0.08, RMSE = 5.42 ± 2.10°). Sagittal joint moments were also correlated (hip: r = 0.89 ± 0.06, RMSE = 0.50 ± 0.16 N·m/kg; knee: r = 0.73 ± 0.15, RMSE = 0.40 ± 0.14 N·m/kg; ankle: r = 0.95 ± 0.02, RMSE = 0.40 ± 0.09 N·m/kg). The GRF agreement was component-dependent: anterior-posterior (CCC = 0.91 ± 0.04, NRMSE = 12.31 ± 3.26%), medial-lateral (CCC = 0.37 ± 0.18, NRMSE = 36.43 ± 18.57%), and vertical (CCC = 0.80 ± 0.10, NRMSE = 14.05 ± 3.23%).
Significance:
This single-camera pipeline showed feasibility for sagittal-plane gait analysis in healthy adults, but mediolateral GRF remains limited.
More Related Videos
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Three-Dimensional Force System
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...