Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Visualizing DNA Damage Repair Proteins in Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids via Immunofluorescence Assays
Published on: February 24, 2023
Natural compounds as epigenetic modulators in gynaecological cancers: From chemoresistance to precision oncology
Prakash Lingasamy1, Blessy Kiruba2, Santhosh Rajakumar3
1Celvia CC AS, Tartu 50411, Estonia; Laboratory of Precision and Nanomedicine, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia; Nalam Biosciences OÜ, Tartu, Estonia.
Background:
Gynaecological cancers, including ovarian, cervical, and endometrial malignancies, remain major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality because of tumour heterogeneity, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. Epigenetic dysregulation, involving aberrant DNA methylation, altered histone modifications, dysregulated non-coding RNAs, and N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA remodelling, contributes to these processes. Direct evidence that natural compounds modulate m⁶A machinery in gynaecological cancers remains absent and is considered a knowledge gap.
Methods:
We synthesised evidence on epigenetic alterations in gynaecological cancers and critically evaluated dietary and plant-derived compounds as candidate epigenetic modulators, focusing on preclinical mechanistic studies, pharmacokinetic data, selected early-phase clinical studies, and computational approaches to compound discovery and biomarker stratification.
Results:
Natural agents, including curcumin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, sulforaphane, berberine, resveratrol, genistein, diindolylmethane, quercetin, capsaicin, and butyrate, have been reported, mainly in preclinical models, to modulate DNA methyltransferases, histone deacetylases, microRNA networks, tumour suppressor gene expression, and chemosensitivity. However, translation is limited by poor bioavailability, pharmacokinetic variability, insufficient tumour-tissue target-engagement data, weak potency compared with approved epigenetic drugs, limited patient-derived model validation, and a lack of biomarker-driven trials. Compound-specific evidence remains uneven, with stronger support for selected chemosensitising mechanisms than for direct clinical epigenetic efficacy.
Conclusions:
Natural compounds are mechanistically plausible but clinically under-validated adjunctive epigenetic modulators. Future development requires standardised formulations, improved delivery systems, tumour-tissue pharmacodynamic validation, multi-omics profiling, patient stratification, and biomarker-guided clinical trials to define their realistic role in precision gynaecological oncology. The proposed translational framework may support rational prioritisation of candidates for future preclinical and clinical testing.
Insights
Natural compounds show potential for epigenetic modulation in gynecological cancers, but clinical validation is limited. Further research is needed to optimize delivery and guide patient selection for effective use.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Epigenetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Gynaecological cancers (ovarian, cervical, endometrial) are challenging due to heterogeneity, recurrence, and resistance.
- Epigenetic dysregulation, including DNA methylation and RNA modifications, drives these cancers.
- A knowledge gap exists regarding natural compounds modulating the N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA remodelling machinery in these cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize evidence on epigenetic alterations in gynaecological cancers.
- To evaluate dietary and plant-derived compounds as epigenetic modulators.
- To identify challenges and propose a framework for clinical translation.
Main Methods:
- Literature synthesis of preclinical, pharmacokinetic, and early-phase clinical studies.
- Evaluation of computational approaches for compound discovery and biomarker stratification.
- Focus on natural compounds targeting epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation and histone modification.
Main Results:
- Numerous natural agents (e.g., curcumin, resveratrol) show preclinical evidence of modulating epigenetic targets and chemosensitivity.
- Clinical translation is hindered by poor bioavailability, variable pharmacokinetics, and insufficient target engagement.
- Evidence is stronger for chemosensitizing effects than direct clinical epigenetic efficacy.
Conclusions:
- Natural compounds are mechanistically plausible adjunctive epigenetic modulators but require clinical validation.
- Future development necessitates standardized formulations, improved delivery, and biomarker-guided trials.
- A translational framework is proposed to prioritize candidates for future research in precision gynaecological oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...
Epigenetic Regulation
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
