Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
Integrating evidence-based methamphetamine interventions into methadone clinics: Structural barriers and
Nguyen Thu Trang1, Dinh Thi Thanh Thuy1, Hoa Hong Nguyen2
1Center for Training and Research on Substance Use & HIV, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam.
Background:
Integrating evidence-based methamphetamine interventions into methadone programs is critical to address increasing methamphetamine use among methadone patients. This study examined the barriers and facilitators of implementing such integration in Vietnam.
Method:
We conducted a qualitative study nested within an adaptive trial, Screen, Treat and Retain Meth-Using People with Opioid Use Disorder in Methadone Clinics (STAR-OM), integrating evidence-based methamphetamine interventions into 15 methadone clinics. Seventy-six in-depth interviews were conducted with participants and methadone providers to seek their experience implementing or receiving the study interventions. Interview guides were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify and explore key themes.
Results:
Results reflected a tension between strong clinical support for integrating methamphetamine interventions and substantial structural constraints. The main facilitator was the perceived impact of interventions driven by social accountability and engagement with peers, providers and family members. Key barriers operated primarily at structural levels and included: (1) restrictive policy environments despite local demand for intervention; (2) workforce precarity and limited financial resources, particularly for contingency management; and (3) logistical implementation challenges such as organizing group sessions, burdensome urine testing, falsified urine samples and limited use of SMS-based reminders.
Conclusion:
While evidence-based methamphetamine interventions were widely perceived as beneficial, major barriers existed at the policy and program levels. Macro-level actions - such as advocating for more harm reduction - oriented drug policies and strengthening workforce capacity - alongside pragmatic, clinic-level implementation strategies are essential for the sustainable adoption and scale-up of evidence-based methamphetamine interventions within Vietnam's methadone program.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Phase II Reactions: Methylation Reactions
The mechanism of methylation unfolds in two stages. The first stage sees a methyltransferase enzyme facilitating the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, forming S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The second stage involves further metabolism of SAH into homocysteine, which can be recycled...
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
