Multi-centre generalisability of deep learning-based dose prediction for head and neck radiotherapy using DAHANCA
Camilla P Nielsen1, Margerie Huet-Dastarac2, Kenneth Jensen3
1Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Deep learning accurately predicts radiotherapy doses for head and neck cancer (HNC), outperforming traditional methods. This validated model enhances automated treatment planning and quality assurance for HNC patients.
Area of Science:
- Radiotherapy
- Medical Physics
- Oncology
Background:
- Deep learning shows promise for automating radiotherapy planning and quality assurance in head and neck cancer (HNC).
- Clinical implementation requires robust validation of model generalisability across diverse datasets.
- This study assesses a deep learning dose prediction model's generalisability in a multi-centre HNC cohort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the generalisability of a deep learning dose prediction model trained on single-centre data.
- To compare the model's performance against a median-based prediction model.
- To explore the impact of dose prediction accuracy on expected patient toxicity.
Main Methods:
- A deep neural network was trained on 388 HNC treatment plans.
- The model was evaluated on an internal test set (42 patients) and a national DAHANCA cohort (560 plans).
- Performance was assessed using dose metrics (Dmean) and compared to a median model, with toxicity explored via NTCP and NTI.
Main Results:
- The deep learning model closely matched clinical dose distributions, with small median Dmean differences for PTVs and OARs across cohorts.
- The model significantly outperformed the median-based model, which exhibited larger dose variations.
- Predicted toxicity showed modest differences from clinically planned toxicity, suggesting potential for quality assurance insights.
Conclusions:
- The deep learning dose prediction model demonstrated strong generalisability across multiple institutions, outperforming a median-based approach.
- Prediction-plan differences were within observed interquartile ranges, supporting clinical adoption.
- Discrepancies in predicted toxicity may highlight areas for improving clinical radiotherapy plans and quality assurance.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
07:53Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Published on: October 13, 2023
