Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
A Practical Approach for Implementing Holistic Review for General Surgery Resident Recruitment
Cody L Mullens1, Jamila K Picart1, Shukri H A Dualeh2
1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; UM National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Implementing a holistic review process in general surgery residency programs enhances transparency and diversity in candidate selection. This structured approach aids in recruiting residents whose values align with the program's mission.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Residency Training
- Applicant Selection Processes
Background:
- Traditional residency selection methods may lack comprehensiveness.
- Academic surgery programs seek to improve candidate evaluation.
- Addressing implicit bias in recruitment is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail the implementation of a holistic review process.
- To enhance transparency and fairness in general surgery residency selection.
- To recruit a diverse pool of qualified applicants.
Main Methods:
- Established a Residency Recruitment Committee.
- Developed a 5-attribute evaluation rubric (clinical/academic excellence, leadership, integrity, work ethic, interest in academic surgery).
- Integrated implicit bias training for reviewers.
Main Results:
- Successfully implemented a holistic review process with 26-38 evaluators per cycle.
- The structured approach facilitated the selection of interview candidates with aligned missions and values.
- Standardized interview questions assessed situational judgment and teamwork.
Conclusions:
- Holistic review is a feasible and effective method for transparent residency selection.
- This process promotes the recruitment of diverse candidates.
- Adaptable rubric and process can suit programs with varying priorities; long-term outcome evaluation is recommended.