Early Prediction of Critical Care Interventions From Pediatric Emergency Department Triage

Trang Ha1, Brandon Kappy1,2, James M Chamberlain1,2

  • 1Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.

Hospital Pediatrics
|July 19, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Machine learning models can predict critical care needs in pediatric emergency departments, improving timely evaluation for at-risk children. This AI-powered triage enhances patient safety and care efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is widely used in US pediatric emergency departments for patient triage.
  • The 5-level ESI classification offers limited risk stratification, potentially delaying care for critically ill children.
  • There is a need for improved methods to identify high-risk pediatric patients during emergency department (ED) triage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of critical care interventions in pediatric ED patients.
  • To create an operationally useful model using only information available at triage.
  • To improve patient prioritization and timeliness of evaluation for critical care.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study at a large urban academic pediatric ED (2016-2024).
  • Development and evaluation of 6 ML algorithms for predicting critical care interventions.
  • Model performance assessed using Average Precision and the trade-off between sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV).
  • Counterfactual analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of risk predictions on evaluation timeliness.

Main Results:

  • Among 886,183 ED visits, 3.0% received critical care interventions.
  • A neural network model achieved the highest Average Precision (0.6).
  • The best model identified 88% of critical care patients with a PPV of 32%.
  • Integrating ML risk predictions could increase timely evaluation for ESI 3 patients from 23.3% to 75.0%.

Conclusions:

  • Developed ML models can rapidly identify pediatric ED patients at risk for critical care interventions.
  • These models can enhance triage accuracy without causing 'alarm fatigue'.
  • The ML-support triage framework shows potential for improving patient care and safety in pediatric EDs.
Abstract