Optimising Radiologist Performance in Cancer Detection on Mammograms: The Impact of Weekly Reading Hours and Test Set...

Early detection through mammographic screening plays a central role in improving breast cancer outcomes, with diagnostic accuracy relying heavily on radiologist performance. While experience and case volume are recognised contributors to accuracy, the specific effect of weekly mammogram reading hours (HPW) remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between HPW and diagnostic performance among BreastScreen (BS) radiologists, non-BreastScreen radiologists, and radiology registrars, and explored whether completing multiple BREAST training test sets enhanced diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective observer-performance study analysed digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) readings from 871 test set completions by BreastScreen radiologists, non-BreastScreen radiologists and radiology registrars across 13 BREAST test sets completed between 2014-2024. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, lesion sensitivity, ROC AUC, and JAFROC. Demographic and performance data of participants were collected through the BREAST platform. Statistical analyses were performed to assess associations between HPW and diagnostic performance, and to identify performance plateau thresholds across HPW categories. Performance of readers improved consistently with increasing HPW for all cohorts, with significant positive correlations observed for most performance metrics (p<0.05). JAFROC plateau values occurred at different thresholds: 20-30 HPW for BreastScreen radiologists, 10-20 HPW for non-BS radiologists, and 5-10 HPW for registrars. In DBT analyses, BreastScreen radiologists achieved significantly higher JAFROC scores than non-BreastScreen radiologists only within the lowest HPW category (p<0.05). Completing ten or more BREAST test sets was not associated with significant improvements in diagnostic performance. Increasing HPW was associated with improved diagnostic performance up to cohort-specific thresholds, beyond which additional reading yielded limited benefit. Establishing optimal HPW levels may help screening services maintain high diagnostic standards while minimising fatigue and supporting workforce sustainability.