Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment
Published on: September 11, 2018
A Scoping Review of "Wet Markets" and Their Risks to Public Health
Emma L Willoughby1, Min Hyun Maeng1, Scott L Greer1
1Emma L. Willoughby, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Fellow, Asia Research Institute, National University Singapore, Singapore. Min Hyun Maeng, MSc, is a PhD Student, Department of Consumer Behavior and Family Economics, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Scott L. Greer, PhD, is the Richard Carl Jelinek Professor of Health Management and Policy, Global Health, and Political Science (by courtesy), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Excellence Chair, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
This review found limited research on the risks of wild animal trade in wet markets. Most studies focus on food safety, highlighting a gap in understanding potential public health threats.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Food Safety
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Wet markets are associated with public health risks due to perceived unhygienic conditions and wildlife trade.
- There is a lack of scientific consensus on responsibility for risk assessment and surveillance of these markets.
- Understanding the existing research landscape is crucial for developing effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of empirical research using the term "wet markets."
- To understand the types of knowledge generated about "wet markets."
- To identify policy recommendations related to these food retail spaces.
Main Methods:
- Scoping review of literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (March 2024).
- Inclusion criteria applied to 335 unique articles, with 144 selected for final review.
- Analysis focused on empirical studies related to "wet markets."
Main Results:
- The majority of studies examined pathogen prevalence in domesticated meat and vegetables, primarily in Asia.
- No empirical studies were identified that linked wild animal trade with food trade in "wet markets."
- A discrepancy exists between Western public health narratives and empirical evidence on food safety in Asian markets.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant gap in empirical research on the risks associated with wild animal trade in wet markets.
- Further research is needed to improve the evidence base for targeted interventions and surveillance.
- Strengthening surveillance is essential for responding to public health risks and understanding their magnitude.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Sources of Food Contamination
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...