Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: April 11, 2019
Replication and Expansion of Pupillary Light Reflex as Diagnostic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Tool in Military Cadets
Nikki E Barczak-Scarboro1,2, Thaddeus Haight1,2, Michael Aderman3
1The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. (HJF), Bethesda , Maryland , USA.
Background And Objectives:
Pupillometers can quantitate an individual's pupillary light reflex (PLR), which involves a complex interaction between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Growing evidence suggests that mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) impairs the regulatory processes that balance sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system responses; therefore, the PLR may serve as a diagnostic mTBI biomarker. Preliminary evidence in this area would be enhanced by replication.
Methods:
One hundred and ninety-six US Military Academy cadets completed standard concussion assessments (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5, and Balance Error Scoring System) during accession for preinjury baseline and post-mTBI within 48 hours, when they were asymptomatic, and when they were cleared for unrestricted return to activity. At each of these time points, a handheld pupillometer was used to assess pupillary light reflex in both eyes consecutively.
Results:
PLR metrics that showed significant disruption (larger change, longer time, and faster velocity) at injury (T1) compared with baseline (T0) included overall diameter change (End-Initial_Diam, P < .001), the percent of pupil constriction (Constriction%, P < .01), the time for the pupil to return to 75% of its starting size (T75, P < .05), and the maximum constriction velocity (Max_Constrict_Velocity, P < .001). Average dilation velocity was not significantly different immediately after injury (T1) but was disrupted (faster velocity) at the asymptomatic time point (T2, Dilat_Velocity, P < .001) and was no longer statistically different from baseline at unrestricted return to activity (T3, P > .5).
Conclusion:
We were able to replicate the use of several PLR metrics as a biomarker for mTBI diagnosis that could easily be included with standard clinical measures.

