Related Experiment Videos
Factors influencing discussion duration in breast cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: insights for streamlining
Lejla Kočo1, Wendelien B G Sanderink2, Mathias Prokop2,3
1Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. lejla.koco@radboudumc.nl.
Purpose:
Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) in breast cancer care improve outcomes but are time-consuming and costly. This study investigates using data from the Dutch national cancer registry (NCR) and hospital electronic medical records (EMR) to efficiently calculate MDTM discussion durations, while complying with privacy laws.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed breast cancer MDTM discussion durations using NCR and EMR data from 2014 to 2018. Discussion times were estimated from EMR timestamps, excluding outliers, and analyzed statistically. Ethical approval was obtained, including only non-opt-out patients.
Results:
The final dataset included 1,048 tumors, 996 patients, and 1,487 MDTM discussion times after exclusions for missing data, duplicates, and outliers. Discussion durations varied significantly, with pre-operative and no-surgery discussions being longer than post-operative ones (p = 0.000), and factors such as MRI availability, tumor differentiation, malignancy, menopausal status, and cancer stage influencing duration in pre-operative cases. In post-operative discussions, molecular subtype, cancer stage, and tumor size were significant, while age, tumor differentiation, and menopausal status had no impact.
Conclusion:
This study evaluates discussion durations in breast cancer MDTMs using retrospective data from the NCR and EMR, demonstrating a feasible approach to assess MDTM functioning. Differences in discussion duration based on patient and tumor characteristics may help optimize MDTM efficiency.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Cancer Survival Analysis