Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Associated With Pulse Pressure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Retrospective
Michel Abou Khalil1, Carlo El Khoury1, Yishi Jia1
1Tulane Research Innovation for Arrhythmia Discovery, Tulane University, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States, 1 504-988-3072.
Insights
Pulse pressure (PP) independently predicts gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This simple measurement can improve bleeding risk assessment for personalized management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Clinical Risk Stratification
Background:
- Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have high bleeding risks, especially with oral anticoagulation.
- Existing risk scores (e.g., HAS-BLED, ORBIT) have limited accuracy in predicting bleeding.
- Pulse pressure (PP), a marker of arterial stiffness, has not been evaluated for bleeding prediction in AF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if elevated pulse pressure (PP) independently predicts major bleeding events in patients with AF.
- To assess PP's predictive accuracy for overall bleeding and specific subtypes (gastrointestinal, intracranial).
- To determine if PP improves risk stratification beyond established clinical factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 4935 AF patients using electronic health records (2010-2019).
- PP derived from outpatient blood pressure measurements, analyzed continuously and by tertiles.
- Primary outcome: time to first major bleeding event (composite of GI, intracranial, other).
- Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for clinical factors and ORBIT score; sensitivity analysis included SBP.
Main Results:
- Over 5 years, 13.7% of patients experienced a bleeding event.
- Elevated PP tertiles were associated with significantly higher gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk (P=.007).
- Each 1 mm Hg increase in PP independently predicted a 1.4% higher GI bleeding risk (HR 1.014, P=.04), even after adjusting for SBP and ORBIT score.
Conclusions:
- Pulse pressure (PP) is an independent predictor of GI bleeding in AF patients.
- PP offers enhanced bleeding risk prediction beyond current clinical risk factors and scores.
- PP is a readily available, low-cost parameter that can refine bleeding risk management in AF.
Background:
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) face significant bleeding risks, particularly those receiving oral anticoagulation; however, existing risk scores such as HAS-BLED and ORBIT demonstrate limited predictive accuracy. Pulse pressure (PP), calculated as the difference between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure, is a noninvasive marker of arterial stiffness that has been associated with cardiovascular outcomes. However, PP has not been evaluated as a predictor of bleeding in this population.
Objective:
This study evaluated whether elevated PP independently predicts major bleeding events, overall and by subtype, in patients with AF after adjusting for established clinical risk factors.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from REACHnet, a PCORnet-affiliated clinical data network in Louisiana. A total of 4935 adults (mean age 63.7, SD 11.0 y; n=1606, 32.5% female) with AF between 2010 and 2019 were included via consecutive sampling of all eligible patients. PP was derived from outpatient blood pressure measurements closest to AF diagnosis and analyzed in tertiles (low: <46, middle: 46-62, high: >62 mm Hg) and continuously per 10 mm Hg. The primary outcome was time to the first bleeding event, a composite of gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and other clinically significant bleeding, identified using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank testing were used for univariable analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was adjusted for age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and the ORBIT score. A sensitivity analysis applied multivariable logistic regression additionally incorporating SBP. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.
Results:
Over a 5-year follow-up, 677 out of 4935 (13.7%) patients experienced a bleeding event (intracranial hemorrhage: n=60, 1.2%; gastrointestinal bleeding: n=195, 4.0%; and other bleeding: n=149, 3.0%). Gastrointestinal bleeding differed significantly across PP tertiles (P=.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed lower gastrointestinal bleeding-free survival in the highest tertile (log-rank P=.004). No significant differences were observed for intracranial (P=.08), other (P=.58), or composite bleeding (P=.22). In multivariable Cox regression, each 1 mm Hg increase in PP was independently associated with a 1.4% higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (hazard ratio 1.014, 95% CI 1.001-1.028; P=.04), approximately 15% per 10 mm Hg. This remained significant after adjusting for SBP and ORBIT score (odds ratio 1.013/mm Hg, 95% CI 1.001-1.025; P=.03), while SBP was not independently significant (P=.13).
Conclusions:
PP independently predicts gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients with AF beyond established clinical risk factors and validated bleeding risk scores. Unlike prior investigations that examined SBP or diastolic blood pressure components in isolation, this is the first study to identify PP as a predictor of gastrointestinal bleeding in this population. As a readily available, low-cost hemodynamic parameter derived from routine clinical measurements, PP could enhance existing risk stratification tools and inform more personalized bleeding risk management strategies in patients with AF.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
