Determining causes of death through an abridged verbal autopsy tool: a pilot test conducted among vulnerable communities in Kolkata, India
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Suman Kanungo1, Melissa Glenda Lewis2, Diplina Barman2
1ICMR National Institute for Research in Bacterial Infections (ICMR-NIRBI), Kolkata, West Bengal, India sumankanungo@gmail.com.
Background:
Users often regard the 2022 WHO verbal autopsy (VA) instrument as lengthy and time-consuming to implement, emphasising the need for a more concise and practical tool, particularly for use in unstable or resource-limited settings. This study aimed to develop, pilot test and validate an abridged version of the WHO VA instrument capable of identifying probable causes of neonatal (0-27 days), child (1 month-11 years) and adult (12-49 years) deaths in vulnerable populations.
Methods:
An abridged VA instrument based on the expert algorithm method was developed and applied to deaths recorded between 2021 and 2022 in three tertiary general hospitals and one tertiary paediatric hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal. VA interviews were conducted between July 2024 and January 2025. Causes of death were assigned using two approaches: (1) underlying medical record diagnoses and (2) a hierarchical computer-based VA algorithm. Diagnostic metrics were used to validate algorithmic causes against medical diagnoses.
Results:
Among 270 deaths (90 per age group), 95.5% yielded a VA diagnosis. Among neonates, the leading causes were sepsis (34.4%: 83.8% VA sensitivity, 94.9% VA specificity), IPRE (25.6%: 69.6%, 97.0%) and pneumonia (16.7%: 100%, 98.7%). Among children, the two most common medical diagnoses were pneumonia (53.3%: 100%, 50%) and other infections including sepsis without a known source (25.6%: 21.7%, 98.5%). Among adults, the two most common medical diagnostic categories were acute febrile illness (38.5%: 80.9%, 98.6%) and cardiovascular diseases (38.5%: 100%, 98.6%). The accuracy of the new VA instrument compared with the medical diagnosis was 81.1% for neonates, 71.1% for children and 87.8% for adults, with an overall accuracy of 80%.
Conclusion:
The abridged VA instrument demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in identifying the probable causes of death across all age groups in the study populations. This instrument holds potential for enhancing cause-of-death reporting in resource-limited settings.
More Related Videos
05:35A Point-of-Care Method with Integrated Decision Support Tool to Estimate Anemia at Population Level
Published on: January 19, 2024
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...