Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Postprandial Glycemic Control With Automated Insulin Delivery With Control-IQ Technology: The Impact of Meal
Marco Marigliano1, Claudia Piona1, Elisa Morotti1
1Section of Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems with Control-IQ struggle to manage blood sugar after high-fat or high-protein meals in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. New strategies are needed for better glycemic control with complex meals.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Pediatric Diabetes Management
Background:
- Adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) often face challenges in postprandial glucose control.
- Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems aim to improve glycemic management in T1D.
- The efficacy of AID systems with Control-IQ technology in managing diverse macronutrient meals requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of an AID system (Tandem Tslim X2 with Control-IQ) using carbohydrate counting (CHC)-based premeal boluses for postprandial glucose (PPG) control.
- To compare PPG control after standard, high-fat (HF), and high-protein (HP) meals in adolescents with T1D.
- To determine if the AID system autonomously adjusts insulin delivery in response to varying meal compositions.
Main Methods:
- A prospective crossover study involving 25 adolescents with T1D.
- Participants consumed three iso-caloric meals (745 kcal): standard, HF (45.9% fat), and HP (24.4% protein).
- A CHC-based bolus was administered 15 minutes pre-meal, with continuous glucose monitoring and AID data collected over 6 hours.
Main Results:
- Six-hour time in range (TIR) was significantly lower after HF (65.2%) and HP (49.9%) meals compared to standard meals (84.3%).
- Postprandial glucose exposure (AUC) was significantly higher after HF and HP meals at both 3 and 6 hours.
- The AID system increased insulin delivery for HF (+26%) and HP (+55%) meals without inducing hypoglycemia.
Conclusions:
- Standard CHC-based premeal boluses with AID systems (Control-IQ) are insufficient for adequate PPG control after HF and HP meals in adolescents with T1D.
- Significant autonomous insulin increases by the AID system did not fully compensate for macronutrient variations.
- Proactive, meal-specific insulin dosing strategies are necessary to optimize glycemic outcomes following nutritionally complex meals.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by the...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...