Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Indoor vs. beach men's volleyball athletes: a comparison of lower body strength and power attributes
Dongting Jiang1,2, Zhenxiang Guo3, Xiaoyu Ling4
1School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Indoor and beach volleyball are performed under contrasting surface and game constraints, but direct comparisons of lower-limb neuromuscular performance in highly trained players are limited. Therefore, this study compared the lower-limb neuromuscular profiles of highly trained male indoor and beach volleyball athletes.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, 46 highly trained, national-level male volleyball athletes (indoor, n = 26; beach, n = 20) completed a standardised battery of lower-limb neuromuscular assessments in a single indoor session, including the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), drop jump (DJ), 10-30 m sprints, and the change-of-direction (COD) T-test. From the force and jump data, the rate of force development over the first 100 ms (RFD-100 ms), reactive strength index (RSI), dynamic strength index (DSI), and eccentric utilisation ratio (EUR) were derived. Between-group differences were examined using independent-samples t-tests, with effect sizes reported as Hedges' g and 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
Indoor players showed markedly faster COD performance, a higher RFD-100 ms, and a higher RSI than beach players (T-test: 8.60 ± 0.31 vs 9.32 ± 0.47 s, g = 1.83, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.52, p < 0.05; RFD-100 ms: 13,421 ± 4660 vs 9883 ± 2536 N·s-1, g = 0.89, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.50, p < 0.05; RSI: 2.08 ± 0.53 vs 1.75 ± 0.47 m·s-1, g = 0.63, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.22, p < 0.05). No clear between-group differences were observed for IMTP peak force, jump height (SJ, CMJ, DJ), 30-m sprint time, DSI, or EUR (all p > 0.05). Beach players recorded slightly faster 10-m and 20-m sprint times, although these differences were not statistically significant (10 m: 1.83 ± 0.15 vs 1.78 ± 0.12 s, g = 0.39, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.97; 20 m: 3.12 ± 0.20 vs 3.04 ± 0.27 s, g = 0.35, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.93).
Conclusion:
Highly trained male indoor and beach volleyball athletes exhibited discipline-specific lower-limb neuromuscular profiles. Indoor players were faster in COD, with higher RFD-100 ms and RSI, consistent with a velocity- and reactivity-oriented profile, whereas beach players showed no such advantage, possibly reflecting the force and stability demands of sand. These differences may inform targeted lower-limb neuromuscular training for each format.
Related Concept Videos
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Impact Strength of Concrete
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
Ionic Strength: Overview
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...

