Assessing the structure of mental health service networks in Belgium: implications for recovery-oriented systems of care
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Mégane Chantry1, Jürgen Magerman2,3, Ilse Goethals2
1Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30 bt B1.30.15, Brussels, 1200, Belgium. megane.chantry@uclouvain.be.
Background:
Service collaboration ensures care continuity and recovery-oriented care for individuals with mental disorders (MD). A recovery-oriented system of care (ROSC) encompasses diverse person-centred services that collaborate to address individual needs and foster social integration. We examined the characteristics of care provision for individuals with MD in Belgium with regard to ROSC principles. Specifically, we analysed the structure of collaboration within existing mental health service networks, focusing on the division between mental health services and specialised services for substance use disorders (SUD).
Methods:
We conducted an online survey involving 309 services across five networks, of which 190 participated. We collected data on referrals and service characteristics. We used Social Network Analysis (SNA) to assess collaboration patterns within service networks, considering network density (i.e. number of ties), transitivity (i.e. tendency toward clustered collaboration), degree distribution (i.e. concentration of ties around certain services), service attributes (e.g. category, care function, and exclusion criteria), and homophily (i.e. tendency to connect with similar services). Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) was used to test whether observed collaboration patterns differed from random collaboration.
Results:
Hospital units and specialised SUD services were central services. Specialised SUD services and generic mental health services were more likely to collaborate with similar services. Likewise, services with the same care function were more likely to collaborate, except hospital units. Networks showed significant transitivity.
Conclusion:
Mental health service networks appear to be structured around organisational boundaries, with limited collaboration between complementary services and a highly hospital-centred configuration. These patterns suggest a misalignment with ROSC principles and may constrain the capacity of care systems to support recovery processes.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
Restorative Care

