Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Detrusor Underactivity Model in Rats by Conus Medullaris Transection
Published on: August 28, 2020
Comparison of Uroflowmetry Time Parameters in Pressure-Flow Study Between Men With Bladder Outflow Obstruction and
Juan Pablo Valdevenito1,2, Abdulmalik Alkhamis3, Andrew Gammie3
1Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Time parameters in uroflowmetry can help differentiate detrusor underactive voiding contraction (DUVC) from bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) in men. Specific ratios like "Time to maximum flow/Voided volume" showed diagnostic accuracy for DUVC versus BOO.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Urodynamics
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Background:
- Differentiating detrusor underactive voiding contraction (DUVC) from bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) in men using free uroflowmetry time parameters remains challenging.
- This study focuses on the pathophysiology of voiding, examining time parameters in pressure-flow studies to distinguish between DUVC and BOO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare uroflowmetry time parameters between men with DUVC and BOO.
- To assess the relationship between these parameters and post-void residual (PVR) volume.
- To explore the diagnostic accuracy of specific time parameters for differentiating DUVC from BOO.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cross-sectional study of urodynamics data from men aged ≥40 years with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms.
- Patients were categorized into pure BOO and pure DUVC groups based on established Bladder Outflow Obstruction Index (BOOI) and Detrusor Contraction Index (DCI) criteria.
- Matched cohorts (n=136 each) were analyzed for differences in pressure-flow study time parameters using statistical tests; ROC analysis determined diagnostic accuracy.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were observed in several uroflowmetry time parameters, including "Time to maximum flow/Voided volume", "Time to maximum flow/Flow time", and "Time to maximum flow/Voiding time".
- Parameters independent of voided volume, such as "Time to maximum flow/Voided volume" (AUC 0.669), "Time to maximum flow/Flow time" (AUC 0.654), and "Time to maximum flow/Voiding time" (AUC 0.627), demonstrated the best diagnostic accuracy for DUVC versus BOO.
- These findings suggest potential for non-invasive differentiation between DUVC and BOO.
Conclusions:
- Specific uroflowmetry time parameters, particularly ratios involving "Time to maximum flow", show significant differences between men with DUVC and BOO.
- The diagnostic accuracy of these parameters supports their potential utility in differentiating between these conditions.
- Further research is warranted to validate these findings for non-invasive clinical application in diagnosing DUVC and BOO.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Anatomy of the Genitourinary System II: Bladder and Urethra

