Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) to improve supportive care in ambulatory oncology care: a
Eden R Brauer1,2, Roshan Bastani3, Eric Cheng3,4
1University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA. erbrauer@mednet.ucla.edu.
A formative evaluation of an electronic patient-reported outcome system for head and neck cancer patients showed strong user readiness. Findings informed design, addressing barriers like time constraints for better supportive care delivery.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Health Informatics
- Oncology Supportive Care
Background:
- Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can enhance oncology symptom assessment and supportive care.
- Implementation challenges often stem from overlooking end-user needs and organizational context.
- A formative evaluation was conducted to guide the design and implementation of an ePRO supportive care screening system in ambulatory oncology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a pre-implementation formative evaluation for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) supportive care screening system.
- To inform the design and implementation strategy for ambulatory oncology care, focusing on head and neck cancer patients.
- To identify barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors influencing system adoption.
Main Methods:
- A prospective mixed-methods observational study utilizing semi-structured interviews.
- Inclusion of clinical staff and head and neck cancer patients as target users.
- Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data on acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and usability.
Main Results:
- Forty-six participants (20 clinical staff, 26 patients) identified current symptom assessment as inadequate.
- Electronic health record integration was favored, but time constraints and alert fatigue were noted barriers.
- High pre-implementation readiness scores for acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and usability were reported by both groups.
Conclusions:
- Pre-implementation formative evaluation effectively identified barriers and facilitators, shaping the intervention and implementation approach.
- High readiness scores suggest significant organizational buy-in and perceived value for the ePRO system.
- The user-informed development process offers a replicable model for optimizing ePRO systems prior to deployment.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Patient-centered Care
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Nursing Evaluation
Section...