Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Application of Simplified Stent-bridging Pancreaticogastrostomy in Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: March 17, 2026
11.5-Fr Large-Bore Plastic Stents Versus Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stents for the Management of
Akinori Maruta1, Takuya Koizumi2, Kota Shimojo2
1First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan. mrak5844@yahoo.co.jp.
Background:
Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are recommended for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, they are associated with a relatively high incidence of non-recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) adverse events (AEs), such as pancreatitis and cholecystitis. The 11.5-Fr large-bore plastic stent (LBPS) is a newly developed stent with a larger diameter than conventional plastic stents. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LBPS and SEMS in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic cancer.
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic cancer between January 2011 and December 2025. Patients were divided into the LBPS and SEMS groups according to the stent placed.
Results:
RBO occurred in 20.0% and 25.0% of patients in the LBPS and SEMS groups, respectively, with no significant difference in the time to RBO between the groups. Pancreatitis and cholecystitis were observed in 0% versus 18.3%, and 0% versus 8.3% of patients in the LBPS and SEMS groups, respectively.
Conclusion:
The 11.5-Fr LBPS demonstrated patency comparable to that of SEMS and was associated with a low incidence of non-RBO AEs. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
