Related Experiment Videos
Machine learning algorithms for predicting arrhythmic events in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: limited enhancement
Joana Certo Pereira1,2, Rita Amador3, Armando Vieira4
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Carnaxide, Lisbon, Portugal. joanacerto@gmail.com.
Insights
A machine learning model using clinical data predicts arrhythmic events in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients better than the ESC risk score. However, its predictive value is similar to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart condition associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death.
- Current risk stratification models for HCM, like the ESC risk score, have limitations in accurately predicting arrhythmic events.
- Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a known imaging biomarker for risk stratification in HCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model using common clinical features to predict arrhythmic events in HCM patients.
- To compare the performance of the developed ML model against the established ESC HCM risk score and LGE quantification.
Main Methods:
- A post-hoc analysis was conducted on data from 531 international HCM patients who underwent CMR.
- Clinical, echocardiographic, and CMR variables, including LGE quantification, were used to train and test various ML models.
- The Random Forest (RF) model was selected as the best performing model and its predictive performance was assessed using AUC.
Main Results:
- The Random Forest (RF) ML model demonstrated strong performance in predicting arrhythmic events (AUC = 0.78), significantly outperforming the ESC HCM risk score (AUC = 0.64).
- The ML model's predictive performance was comparable to LGE quantification alone (AUC = 0.76), with no significant incremental improvement.
- The study identified a composite endpoint of sudden cardiac death, aborted SCD, and sustained ventricular tachycardia.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models integrating clinical variables can significantly improve the prediction of arrhythmic events in HCM compared to current clinical risk scores.
- The incremental value of clinical ML models over LGE imaging alone is limited, highlighting the strong prognostic power of LGE.
- These findings are exploratory and suggest further investigation into integrating ML with imaging biomarkers for HCM risk stratification.
Abstract:
We aimed to develop and assess the performance of a Machine learning (ML) model integrating common clinical features to predict arrhythmic events in patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Post-hoc analysis of an international multicenter registry of 531 HCM patients (49 years (IQR 35-61), 57% male) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The dataset comprised clinical, echocardiographic, and CMR variables, including quantification of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) using the + 6 SD method. The endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death (SCD), aborted SCD, and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). A total of 28 events occurred over a median follow-up of 4.1 (IQR 1.8-7.3) years. Several ML models were developed and the predictive performance of the best model was compared to the ESC HCM risk score and to the amount of LGE. The Random Forest (RF) was the most effective method showing a good performance for predicting arrhythmic events [AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82, p < 0.001)], substantially outperforming the ESC HCM risk score [AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.62-0.67; p < 0.001), p < 0.001 for comparison]. However, when compared to LGE alone [AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84, p < 0.001)], the RF model did not provide significant improvement in predicting the endpoint (p = 0.817 for comparison). A ML model using available clinical variables significantly outperformed the ESC HCM risk score in predicting arrhythmic events in HCM. However, its incremental value over LGE alone was weak, underscoring the strong predictive value of this imaging marker. This findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias