Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Trans-Tympanic Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Ototoxicity
Published on: March 16, 2018
Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss Prevention With Intratympanic Therapy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zachary A Kons1,2, Calvin J Kersbergen1,2, Deborah Goss1,2
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear.
Introduction:
Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a well-described, long-term consequence of cisplatin treatment for malignancy. Intratympanic (IT) injections have been trialed to prevent CIHL in humans. To provide clarity on which agents have been studied through IT injection and to review their efficacy for hearing loss prevention, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources:
OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried.
Methods:
Databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Prospective randomized trials were included, and a systematic review was performed for all studies. Demographic, audiometric, and therapeutic data were collected. Random-effects models were used to compare across studies, and subgroup analyses were performed for each IT agent.
Results:
The initial database search yielded 1017 articles, which were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ten studies were identified, involving a total of 284 patients. Studies included data on IT dexamethasone, IT N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and IT sodium thiosulfate (STS). Pooled analysis across all agents and frequencies did not reveal a significant difference in hearing thresholds between treatment and control ears [prediction interval [-3.77, 3.20], negative favors treatment). Subgroup analysis of IT dexamethasone [-1.74, 3.80] and IT NAC [-1.02, 4.64] also did not demonstrate significant differences. STS data were not amenable to pooled analysis; however, one study demonstrated a significant decrease in ASHA-defined ototoxicity (40% vs. 85%, P=0.0027).
Conclusions:
To date, no IT agent has consistently prevented CIHL, although limited data suggest that IT STS may decrease ototoxicity. More trials are necessary to fully elucidate these effects.

