Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Disagreement judgments capture more than differences in beliefs
Kerem Oktar1, John Branson Byers1, Tania Lombrozo1
1Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Cognition
|July 21, 2026
Summary
Disagreement judgments are not solely based on differing beliefs. Other factors, like belief extremity, significantly influence how we perceive disagreement and its social consequences.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Decision Making
Background:
- Research acknowledges both positive and negative consequences of disagreement.
- Psychological mechanisms behind disagreement judgments remain unclear.
- Existing models often assume disagreement judgments simply reflect belief divergence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the psychological mechanisms underlying interpersonal disagreement judgments.
- To test the predictive power of belief divergence versus other belief properties.
Main Methods:
- Utilized predictive modeling with a sample of 238 participants.
- Analyzed judgments of disagreement in relation to belief divergence and extremity.
Main Results:
- Judgments of disagreement correlate with belief divergence.
- Belief extremity significantly influences disagreement judgments.
- Belief properties beyond divergence are crucial for predicting social outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The assumption that disagreement judgments solely track belief differences is empirically unsupported.
- Disagreement perception is influenced by multiple belief characteristics.
- Understanding these nuances is key to predicting social consequences like perceived bias or incompetence.
Related Concept Videos
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
01:26Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
01:29Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
01:31Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...