Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Mechanical demand shapes anticipatory kinematic adjustments differently in drop and jump landings: Evidence from a
Romain Bechet1, Bénédicte Schepens2, Clément N Gambelli3
1Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, EPF Engineering School, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, IBHGC-Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, F-75013 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Landing from a jump presents distinct challenges that require accurate prediction of both ground contact timing and the characteristics of the forthcoming impact forces to generate anticipatory kinematic adjustments to efficiently dissipate energy. This study quantified these adjustments under simulated microgravity to characterize their temporal and magnitude features. Nine participants performed countermovement jumps (CMJ) and drop-landings (DL) under simulated microgravity during parabolic flights, using a subject loading system to apply downward force in weightlessness (0g). Ground reaction forces and sagittal-plane kinematics were recorded to compute hip, knee and ankle joint angles, angular velocities, and joint flexion onsets. Loading rate, peak vertical ground reactions forces and extra work were computed to quantify the effect of anticipatory adjustments. A linear mixed-effects model examined the effect of energy to be dissipated at touchdown (ETD), task (CMJ or DL) and their interaction on onsets of joint flexion, joint angles and angular velocities at touchdown (TD). Joint flexion onsets occurred later relative to TD with increased ETD, to reach smaller joint flexion angles at TD. When expressed relative to the instant of downward fall initiation, latency of joint flexion also varied with ETD, indicating that adjustments do not rely on fixed timing reference. Joint angular velocities at touchdown increased with ETD in CMJ, suggesting a combined modulation of onset timing and angular acceleration to achieve the required velocity at TD. During DL, angular velocities at TD were lower, leading to reduced extra work and greater loading rates. Overall, these findings highlighted the critical role of anticipatory kinematic adjustments and the importance of fall initiation in energy dissipation during landing.
Related Concept Videos
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's angular speed. Since the...
Free-falling Bodies: Introduction
Free-falling Bodies: Example
The...
Acceleration due to Gravity on Other Planets
Astronomical observations are thus used to measure the acceleration due to gravity on other planets. This can be determined by observing the effect of a planet's gravity on objects close to it. The crucial factor that helps in this...
Impact: Problem Solving
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
