Related Experiment Videos
Financial factors shaping treatment decisions in oncology: A systematic review
Ebunoluwa J Olunuga1, Joshua Woo1, Anagh Kulkarni1
1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Purpose:
The rising cost of cancer care has made financial considerations increasingly prominent in oncology practice. Although patient financial toxicity is well studied, how cost-related factors influence physician treatment decision-making is less clearly understood. This systematic review evaluates how various financial factors shape prescribing and treatment decisions in oncology.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies evaluated associations between financial exposures (e.g., drug pricing, reimbursement, promotional payments, formulary status, patient out-of-pocket costs) and physician treatment decisions in oncology. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (ROBINS-I) were performed by independent reviewers. Findings were synthesized descriptively due to study heterogeneity.
Results:
Of the 7206 unique articles identified, 60 studies met inclusion criteria. Financial influences operated across three domains: Physician-industry, physician-patient, and physician-physician. Industry payments and financial incentives were consistently associated with increased prescribing of promoted or profitable drugs, particularly when incentives were large or salient. Patient out-of-pocket costs frequently influenced recommendations, though cost discussions were less common than cost-informed decisions. Physicians endorsed cost-conscious care in principle but reported tension between stewardship and norms of offering all potentially beneficial therapies, alongside limited access to cost information.
Conclusion:
Financial factors influence oncology treatment decisions at multiple levels, with system- and industry-level incentives exerting strong downstream effects. Physicians are tasked with delivering cost-conscious care without sufficient tools or structural support, highlighting the need for broader system-level interventions.
Policy Summary:
Supporting cost-conscious cancer care requires system-level redesign, not sole reliance on individual clinician behavior. Policies should embed financial considerations upstream through formularies, reimbursement policies, and clinical guidelines, while improving transparency for both clinicians and patients. Efforts should also strengthen regulation of industry-physician relationships and integrate financial navigation and decision-support tools into oncology care.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...