Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

07:32
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
How Much Inter-Arch Discrepancy Occurs During Orthognathic Surgery?
Sung Bin Youn1, In Seon Son2, Shin-Jae Lee3
1Orthognathic Facial Contouring Surgery Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Summary
This study quantified interarch discrepancy in splint-guided orthognathic surgery, finding a modest inferior displacement. Facial symmetry and surgical sequence did not significantly impact this discrepancy.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Orthodontics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate virtual surgical planning transfer is crucial for orthognathic surgery.
- Intraoperative adaptation errors, particularly interarch discrepancy, are not well-documented.
- Surgical splints are vital for guiding the transfer of planning to the operative field.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define and quantify interarch discrepancy during splint-guided orthognathic surgery.
- To evaluate if facial symmetry influences the magnitude of interarch discrepancy.
- To assess the impact of surgical sequence on interarch discrepancy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 119 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
- Analysis of interarch discrepancy using 3D vector components and root mean square (RMS) magnitude.
- Statistical comparison based on facial symmetry and surgical sequence (maxilla-first, mandible-first, mandible-only).
Main Results:
- A statistically significant inferior deviation was observed across all regions (anterior, posterior).
- The overall root mean square (RMS) discrepancy was 1.23 ± 0.61 mm, indicating a modest magnitude.
- Facial symmetry and surgical sequence were not significantly associated with the overall RMS discrepancy.
Conclusions:
- Interarch discrepancy in splint-guided orthognathic surgery demonstrates a consistent inferior displacement.
- The overall magnitude of this discrepancy is modest and not significantly influenced by facial symmetry or surgical sequence.
- Findings contribute to understanding intraoperative adaptation errors in orthognathic surgery.

