Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans
Published on: May 24, 2017
Motor cortical excitability is differentially modulated by HIIT and strength exercise
Mohamad Rostami1, Annemarie Lee1, Ashlyn K Frazer1
1Monash Exercise Neuroplasticity Research Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) enhances corticospinal excitability in non-exercised muscles more than strength exercise (SE). HIIT shows greater remote neuromodulatory effects, impacting neurorehabilitation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Exercise Physiology
- Motor Control
Background:
- High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and strength exercise (SE) are known to induce plasticity in exercised muscles.
- The systemic neuromodulatory effects of HIIT are well-documented, but comparable remote responses to SE are less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate changes in corticospinal, intracortical, and spinal excitability in a non-exercised muscle (flexor carpi radialis) after single-session HIIT and plantar flexion SE.
- To compare the motor performance outcomes between HIIT and SE in remote muscle groups.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover design was employed with 18 participants undergoing HIIT cycling, plantar flexion SE, and a control condition.
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation assessed corticospinal and spinal excitability.
- Motor performance was evaluated using reaction time tasks and maximum voluntary force measurements.
Main Results:
- HIIT significantly increased motor-evoked potential amplitude and reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition in the non-exercised muscle.
- Both HIIT and SE improved reaction time compared to baseline and control conditions.
- HIIT demonstrated greater reductions in silent period duration compared to SE.
Conclusions:
- HIIT induces more widespread corticospinal excitability enhancements in remote, non-exercised muscles compared to unilateral, small-muscle SE.
- Single-session SE may not be sufficient to elicit significant remote corticospinal excitability changes.
- Findings have implications for designing neurorehabilitation strategies targeting remote muscle groups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...

